Reino Unido: taxista muçulmano recusa transportar cegos acomanhados de cão-guia

É o islão, para quem o quer ver!

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

The Muslim revulsion for dogs comes from Muhammad: "Ibn Mughaffal reported: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) ordered killing of the dogs, and then said: What about them, i. e. about other dogs? and then granted concession (to keep) the dog for hunting and the dog for (the security) of the herd, and said: When the dog licks the utensil, wash it seven times, and rub it with earth the eighth time." -- Sahih Muslim 551

Here again, even in the West, non-Muslims must accommodate Muslim mores -- never the other way around.

Sharia Alert from Staffordshire. "Blind couple's anger as taxi refuses guide dog," from the Staffordshire Newsletter, November 25 (thanks to Europe News):

A BLIND couple were "disgusted" to be turned away by a Stafford taxi driver because of their award-winning guide dog. Doreen and Ernest Dix were refused entry to a cab parked at the pick-up point behind Stafford market last week. The Great Haywood pensioners claim the driver did not want Blake, the current West Midlands guide dog of the year, in his cab. This contravenes the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) 2005 and can land offenders a £1,000 fine unless they certify they have a dog allergy. Mrs Dix, 71, said this was the first time her golden retriever-labrador cross had been rejected from a taxi. She said: "I can barely see, but saw the driver wave his hands and say 'no, no, no' as we approached his cab. "We were both very upset and were made to feel really small, but just got the next taxi in the end. "We're moving to Stafford soon and this is a very poor start indeed." Eight-two-year-old Mr Dix, whose eyesight is worse than his wife's, was "appalled" by the driver's behaviour. He said: "I've been registered blind for 28 years and have never been discriminated against by a taxi driver before this. "If he isn't willing to pick up certain people, then he shouldn't be in a queue of taxis earmarked for shoppers. "The driver we eventually used agreed it was appalling it made me feel like a second-class citizen."... Get used to it. More is coming. In recent years, there have been reports of Muslim drivers refusing the blind due to their doctrine's assertion that dogs are unclean. However, the DDA does not consider this an excuse.... Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/gj3z

Sobre a aversão islâmica aos cães, pode ler esta entrada e procurar na nossa página vários exemplos de como esta prática se multiplica na Europa.

Islamofobia: delito de opinião

Amplify’d from www.bivouac-id.com

Nous assistons à la fabrication planétaire d’un nouveau délit d’opinion, analogue à ce qui se faisait jadis dans l’Union soviétique contre les ennemis du peuple.

Forgé par les intégristes iraniens à la fin des années 70 pour contrer les féministes américaines, le terme d’«islamophobie», calqué sur celui de xénophobie, a pour but de faire de l’islam un objet intouchable sous peine d’être accusé de racisme. Cette création, digne des propagandes totalitaires, entretient une confusion délibérée entre une religion, système de piété spécifique, et les fidèles de toutes origines qui y adhèrent. Or une confession n’est pas une race, pas plus que ne l’est une idéologie séculière : l’islam, comme le christianisme, est révéré par des Arabes, des Africains, des Asiatiques, des Européens, de même que des hommes de tous pays sont ou ont été marxistes, libéraux, anarchistes. Jusqu’à preuve du contraire, on a le droit, dans un régime démocratique, de juger les religions mensongères et rétrogrades et de ne pas les aimer. Se méfier de l’islam comme on a pu en d’autres temps se méfier du catholicisme, juger inquiétant son prosélytisme agressif, sa prétention à la vérité unique, son penchant sacrificiel, c’est manifester un sentiment qu’on estimera légitime ou absurde, ce n’est pas faire preuve de racisme. Faut-il parler de «libéralophobie» ou de «socialistophobie» parce qu’on est contre le règne du marché ou la redistribution des richesses ? Ou faut-il rétablir le délit de blasphème, aboli en 1791 par la Révolution, comme le réclame chaque année l’Organisation de la conférence islamique ainsi qu’en France, en 2006, un député UMP, Jean-Marc Roubaud, soucieux de punir tout ce qui bafoue ou calomnie «les sentiments religieux d’une communauté ou d’un Etat quel qu’il soit». Le pari des sociétés ouvertes, c’est de concilier la coexistence pacifique des grandes croyances avec le droit à la libre expression. La liberté de culte est garantie et la liberté de critiquer les cultes également. Les Français, échaudés par des siècles de domination cléricale, souhaitent un affichage discret des croyances. Réclamer des droits séparés pour telle ou telle communauté, imposer de strictes limites à l’examen des dogmes nous ramènerait directement à l’Ancien Régime. Le terme d’islamophobie remplit plusieurs fonctions : nier pour mieux la légitimer la réalité d’une offensive intégriste en Europe, attaquer la laïcité en l’assimilant à un nouveau fondamentalisme. Mais surtout faire taire les musulmans qui osent remettre le Coran en cause, en appellent à l’égalité entre les sexes, au droit à l’apostasie et aspirent à pratiquer paisiblement leur foi sans subir le diktat de doctrinaires ou de barbus. Il faut donc stigmatiser ces jeunes filles qui refusent le voile, souhaitent marcher sans honte, tête nue, dans la rue, foudroyer ces Français, ces Allemands, ces Anglais d’origine maghrébine, turque, africaine, algérienne qui réclament le droit à l’indifférence religieuse, le droit de ne pas croire en Dieu, de ne pas jeûner pendant le ramadan. Il faut les désigner, ces renégats, à la vindicte de leurs coreligionnaires, les faire taire pour bloquer tout espoir d’une mutation chez les fidèles du Prophète (en France et de façon révélatrice, c’est un «Collectif contre l’islamophobie» qui soutient juridiquement les femmes verbalisées pour port du voile intégral). Nous assistons à la fabrication planétaire d’un nouveau délit d’opinion, analogue à ce qui se faisait jadis dans l’Union soviétique contre les ennemis du peuple. Et ce avec l’onction des médias et des pouvoirs publics. Notre président lui-même, jamais en retard d’une bourde, n’a-t-il pas comparé l’islamophobie à l’antisémitisme ? L’erreur est tragique : le racisme s’attaque aux personnes en tant qu’elles sont coupables d’être ce qu’elles sont, le Noir, l’Arabe, le Juif, le Blanc. L’esprit critique, à l’inverse, porte sur les vérités révélées, les écritures toujours susceptibles d’exégèses, de transformations. Cette confusion a pour objet de déplacer la question religieuse du plan intellectuel au plan pénal, toute objection ou moquerie étant passible de poursuites. Quant aux profanations de tombes, de lieux de culte, si elles relèvent évidemment des tribunaux, elles touchent dans leur immense majorité en France les cimetières ou églises chrétiennes (1). On s’en veut de le rappeler : de tous les monothéismes, c’est le christianisme qui est aujourd’hui le plus persécuté dans le monde, surtout dans les pays musulmans, Algérie, Irak, Egypte entre autres. Il est plus facile d’être musulman à Londres, New York ou Paris que protestant, catholique au Moyen-Orient ou en Afrique du Nord. Mais le vocable de «christianophobie» ne prend pas et c’est heureux. Imagine-t-on la Saint-Barthélemy condamnée par nos ancêtres sous l’angle de la discrimination plutôt que du fanatisme religieux ? Il est des mots qui contribuent à infecter la langue, à en obscurcir le sens. «Islamophobie» fait partie de ces termes à bannir d’urgence du vocabulaire. Source : Libération

See more at www.bivouac-id.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/gi0h

Manifestantes Islâmicos opõem-se ao perdão de Ásia Bibi

Rafik: um lutador contra o islão.

Amplify’d from rafik-rafikresponde.blogspot.com

Como eu já havia dito antes, a nossa irmã em Cristo ainda esta em perigo, ela não estará salva ate a sua chegada ao Brasil. No Paquistão, a INOCÊNCIA de alguém NÃO IMPORTA. Asia Bibi tera que ser executada a qualquer custo, a menos, que ela seja salva do Paquistão.

Vou resumir a noticia do Associated Press e dar minha opinião sobre o caso.

O Presidente Paquistanês, não ira perdoar Ásia Bibi imediatamente por ter insultado o Islam. Ele pediu que o caso seja revisto e ele poderá perdoa-la, SOMENTE se o caso for demorar muito. Ela já esta na cadeia por UM ANO E MEIO e ainda eles querem mante-la por la mais tempo? O governo do Paquistão tem suas mãos sujas de sangue.

Logicamente o presidente do Paquistão esta com medo da revolta do povo e com medo da pressão internacional. Voce sabe, estes muçulmanos devotos querem ver a cabeça da Ásia Bibi rolar, ou vê-la pendurada em uma forca, não hesitarão em MATAR por Allah.

Um grupo de 250 Muçulmanos “linha dura” (fieis seguidores do modelo de vida que Maomé estabeleceu), promoveram um protesto na cidade de Lahore, alertaram com AMEAÇAS ao presidente para não perdoar a mulher. O crime supostamente cometido, parece não ter perdão.

Estes manifestantes, “cheios de amor e compaixão”, também ameaçaram o presidente para não tentar MUDAR A LEI DA BLASFÊMIA. Qualquer um que tente promover a mudança desta lei BURRA e RETROGRADA é ameaçado de morte no Paquistão.

Estes grupos sao PODEROSOS o suficiente e tem muita influencia na população do Paquistão. Com razão o presidente e os políticos em geral tem medo deles.

A frase que os manifestantes cantavam durante os protestos era: “Nos estamos prontos para sacrificar as nossas vidas pelo Profeta Maomé”. O problema não esta em morrer por uma causa, o problema esta em MATAR por uma causa.

O protesto foi organizado por um grupo SUNITA chamado “Movimento de Proteção a HONRA DO PROFETA”. Convenhamos, que um movimento como este, já é uma clara indicação que algo esta errado com a HONRA DE MAOMÉ.

Ele é acusado de: pedofilia, de promover prostituição legalizada (Muta), de promover violência domestica, de fingir ser profeta, de crimes contra a humanidade, de enriquecimento ilícito, de criar leis que beneficiam a si mesmo, de assassinatos e de promover ódio e guerras contra os seus inimigos, de ter tido um caso amoroso com uma escrava Copta chamada Maria, etc. As acusações contra a honra de Maomé são tantas que encheriam bibliotecas inteiras. Tudo esta registrado na vasta literatura Islâmica.

Será que existe alguma organização como esta para defender a Honra de Jesus também? Claro que não. Jesus não precisa de ninguém defender a sua honra porque ele não deve nada para ninguém. Ele foi o único ser humano que NUNCA PECOU.

Como pode algum RESPEITAR estas leis? Que tipo de critério voce esta usando para dizer que as leis Islâmicas sao igualmente validas e devem ser respeitadas?

Um Cristão, homem corajoso chamado Shahbaz Bhatti que é Ministro dos Assuntos da MINORIA, luta pela abolição desta lei burra e estúpida. Ele disse:

“Eu estou com medo das ameaças, mas eu estou pronto para sacrificar tudo por causa da JUSTIÇA em que eu acredito”

Imaginem como seria o Brasil se alguns dos nossos políticos tivessem somente uma fração da coragem deste homem.

Continuem orando por Ásia Bibi. A situação continua tão caótica como antes. Ela e a família ainda continuam correndo risco de vida. Por favor, continuem intercedendo diante da presidência da Republica para traze-la ao Brasil.

See more at rafik-rafikresponde.blogspot.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/gfvk

Defesa de Sabaditsch-Wolff: o islão segundo os muçulmanos

Será Sabaditsch-Wolff julgada pela lei austríaca ou pela lei islâmica?
Pela austríaca, dificilmente poderá ser condenada, uma vez que, segundo julgamos saber, apenas disse a verdade sobre o islão, tal como se encontra nas fontes islâmicas: Alcorão, Suná e outros documentos da teologia/jurisprudência (tudo a mesma coisa no islão). Pela sharia, é culpada porque, depois de tornar público o que descobriu naquelas fontes, se atreveu a expressar uma opinião negativa sobre o islão.

Amplify’d from gatesofvienna.blogspot.com

Below are the contents of the document file that will be used by the defense in the trial of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff:

The book that enjoys the central place of honor in the photo is ’Umdat al-salik wa ’uddat al-nasik, or The reliance of the traveller and tools of the worshipper. It is commonly referred to as Reliance of the Traveller when cited in English. This particular version is the Revised Edition (published 1991, revised 1994) and is “The Classic Manual of Islamic Sacred Law ’Umdat al-Salik by Ahmad ibn Naqib al-Misri (d. 769/1368) in Arabic with Facing English Text, Commentary, and Appendices”, edited and translated by Nuh Ha Mim Keller. The publisher is listed as amana publications in Beltsville, Maryland. It is considered an authoritative source on Sunni Islamic law, because it is certified as such by Al-Azhar University in Cairo. There is no higher authority on Sunni Islamic doctrine than Al-Azhar; it is the closest equivalent to the Vatican that can be found in Islam. So whatever you find in Reliance of the Traveller is definitive Islamic law. No Sunni Muslim jurist would argue against anything cited there. And, as we will soon discover, everything that “denigrates religious teachings” in Elisabeth’s seminar can be supported by one or more passages in al-Misri’s treatise. From beating your wife to excising your daughter’s genitalia: it’s all in there. However, this still may not be an adequate defense for quoting and referring to it. It has been well-established in a number of jurisdictions — including several in the West — that a non-Muslim who quotes the Koran accurately can still be convicted of “hate speech”. This aligns with the definition of Islamic slander (also to be found in Reliance) which considers anything that insults Islam, whether true or false, to be defamation. So Elisabeth may still be convicted. Under the Sharia rules used in the brave new world of the Islamic Caliphate of Eurabia, she actually is guilty. We’ll find out soon enough whether the Austrian judge is willing to buy into all this nonsense. Read more at gatesofvienna.blogspot.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/fxen

Julgamento de Sabaditsch-Wolff começa dia 23/11/2010

Começa hoje um processo a acompanhar com toda a atenção através de vários blogues, como os abaixo indicados.

É um processo da maior importância, uma vez que Sabaditsch-Wolff será julgada por ter proferido afirmações verídicas sobre o islão. Se for condenada, a análise crítica do islão na Áustria fica virtualmente proibida, facto que pode contagiar a jurisprudência europeia.
Por outro lado, o julgamento cria uma oportunidade altamente mediática para dar a conhecer ao cidadão médio, largamente ignorante da matéria, o que é o islão, não apesar dos media de massas, mas por seu intermédio, como foi o caso do julgamento de Geert Wilders, transmitido na televisão holandesa, o que permitiu que muitos holandeses ouvissem, pela primeira vez, alguns académicos do islão a dizer, preto no branco, o que o islão é: um complexo político-religioso totalitário com aspirações globais.

Amplify’d from gatesofvienna.blogspot.com

Like the trial of Geert Wilders, next week’s trial of Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff will be a historic milestone in the resistance to the Islamization of Europe — or a tombstone for European civil liberties, if Elisabeth is convicted. The first hearing in Elisabeth’s case will take place in the Vienna court on November 23rd, starting at 9:00am CET (3:00am EST). In collaboration with Europe News, Tundra Tabloids, and the Save Free Speech website, I will be live-blogging the event as early as I can manage to get up that morning. The reporting team will aim to decipher exactly what the offense is that Elisabeth has been charged with. It is expected that the entire audio recording from the FPÖ seminars will be played in court, permitting the prosecutor to explain in detail what cannot be permitted to be said, and why the religiousness of Islamic teachings makes it so. The defense, for its part, can be expected to document the accuracy and truthfulness of what was said, thus focusing on the core problem: Is it illegal to speak the truth about Islam? The live-blogging will report core issues as they unfold during the day, which may become detailed and extensive. At the end of the day, an edited report of the highlights will be published at one or more of the participating sites. Stay tuned on Tuesday, and keep an eye on the live-blogging pages at Tundra Tabloids and the ESW defense site.

Previous posts about the hate speech case against Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff: 2009 Dec 5 Fighting a Hate Speech Charge in Austria 11 Heckling the Counterjihad 14 Whose Law? 17 Defaming the Muslims of Pinkafeld 2010 Mar 11 A Mother and an Activist 20 An Austrian “Hate School” 22 Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff at the Freedom Defense Initiative 29 Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff and the Wiener Akademikerbund Sep 9 “Islam is a Political Ideology Disguised as a Religion” 16 “Justice Must Not Be Made the Handmaiden of Sharia” 17 The Truth Does Not Matter Oct 11 Interview With Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff 16 Is the Truth Illegal in Austria? 20 A Court Date for Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff 21 BPE Press Release on Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff 22 Elisabeth’s Voice: An Appeal 23 Elisabeth’s Voice: A Follow-Up 24 Raising Our Voices 25 Elisabeth’s Voice is Growing 27 Elisabeth’s Voice: More Information 27 A Bit More Media Attention? 28 We Are Elisabeth’s Voice 30 Elisabeth’s Voice in Amsterdam 31 Mark Steyn Joins Elisabeth’s Voice Nov 2 Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff: Target of Western Shariah 6 Anatomy of a Discussion with a Leftist Journalist 8 ESW in the WSJ 10 “The Left is Very Much the New Far Right” 11 Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff Versus the State of Denial 17 Elisabeth’s Voice: An Update 15 The New English Review Interviews Elisabeth Sabaditsch-Wolff Read more at gatesofvienna.blogspot.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/fx55

Eurábia: numa rua perto de si

Antevisão de um futuro próximo, se continuarmos de braços cruzados.

Amplify’d from www.bivouac-id.com

« Rue de la Polygamie », « Rue de la Charia », « Place Allah-Akbar », « Avenue du Halal impératif », « Place Mort aux infidèles » : les habitants de Rezé, dans la banlieue Sud de Nantes, ont eu la surprise hier matin de découvrir que les voies de leur ville avaient été rebaptisées.

L’opération, qui n’a pas été revendiquée, intervient dans la ville où réside le très médiatique Lies Hebbadj, le présumé « polygame de fait », plusieurs fois mis en examen et qui vient d’être condamné à 700 euros d’amende pour abus de confiance.

Alors qu’il était président de l’association culturelle musulmane de Rezé (ACMR) Lies Hebbadj avait pris contact avec la ville de Rezé pour demander la construction d’une mosquée. « Je n’ai aucune opposition sur le principe… » avait déclaré à l’époque le Maire socialiste de Rezé, Gilles Retière. Un avis qui manifestement n’a pas été du goût de tous les Rezéens.

Novopress.info, 2010, Dépêches libres de copie et diffusion sous réserve de mention de la source d’origine [http://breizh.novopress.info/] Read more at www.bivouac-id.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/fua4

Missionário espanhol no Paquistão: "Os islamitas sentem o cheiro do medo e acorrem para derramar sangue"

Amplify’d from www.minutodigital.com

En su internado viven jóvenes llegados de zonas rurales, donde les acuchillaron por no querer convertirse al islam. Se han cambiado el nombre y no pueden volver a sus pueblos. El colegio está en un barrio habitado por 50.000 cristianos, y eso atrae a los islamistas más violentos. Pablo J. Ginés ha entrevistado en La Razón a Miguel Ángel Ruiz, misionero en Pakistán y director del Centro de Formación Profesional Don Bosco en Lahore desde 2005.

–¿Cuándo ha pasado más miedo como misionero?

–Durante la crisis de las caricaturas danesas sobre Mahoma. Se convocó una marcha islamista para después del rezo del viernes en la mezquita, que iba a pasar por nuestro colegio. Lo vaciamos, enviamos a los chicos a sus casas, y dije a nuestros tres guardias de seguridad que no se dejasen ver, para no dar excusas a la violencia. Amigos musulmanes me invitaron a esconderme en su casa, pero mi deber era quedarme en el colegio. Ese día pasé miedo.

–¿Tres guardias de seguridad?

–Vamos a contratar un cuarto. Y el Gobierno de Paquistán nos ha dicho que nuestro colegio es objetivo de Al Qaida, y que tenemos que comprar un detector de metales.

–¿Y su momento más triste?

–La matanza de la aldea de Gojra el año pasado, cuando destruyeron 50 casas de cristianos y cuatro niños murieron quemados. Esa violencia sin sentido me hace sufrir mucho más que los desastres naturales o las inundaciones. Te puede hacer perder la fe en el ser humano. Y nadie hizo nada. Luego vienes a España y ves que te multan con mil euros por cortar un árbol, pero que no se defiende la vida humana.

–¿Dialogar con el islam?

–Es necesario pero, ¿quién es el interlocutor? ¿Y qué autoridad tiene? El respetadísimo Gran Muftí de la Universidad de Al-Azhar, en El Cairo, decretó que vestir hiyab no era una obligación islámica, que era sólo algo cultural y opcional. Las estudiantes de su propia universidad, favorables al velo, protestaron y lo desautorizaron. No hay autoridad central en el islam, sólo puedes hablar con personas concretas que te acepten como eres.

–¿Qué han hecho las embajadas en el caso de Asia Bibi?

–El nuncio me dijo que la mañana en que salió el caso, diez embajadores distintos le llamaron para expresar su apoyo, pero a nivel personal. Sus países y gobiernos no han hecho nada hasta ahora. Sólo conozco un caso en que países europeos se movieran por ayudar a un cristiano. Fue el año pasado, por un afgano converso al catolicismo en Europa, que al visitar Afganistán fue detenido. Italia protestó y Angela Merkel llamó a consultas al embajador paquistaní. Pero Paquistán es distinto, es una potencia nuclear. Sólo respetan a los americanos, Europa les parece débil, porque no tiene religión. Ningún país se ha movilizado para acabar con la Ley de Blasfemia pakistaní. El General Musharraf la intentó quitar en 2002, debatirla en el congreso. La alianza de partidos musulmanes, del norte del país, donde hay 25.000 madrasas, le amenazó con sacar un millón de estudiantes a las calles y derrocar su Gobierno si tocaba esa ley. Un día explotó una madrasa porque estaban manipulando explosivos y tenían un arsenal dentro. En Occidente nadie se enteró. Los islamistas controlan el Bajo Tribunal y la enseñanza. Si el Gobierno tomase el control de las escuelas, en diez años cambiaba todo a mejor.

–¿Existe el islam moderado?

–En Paquistán los saudíes invierten en fundamentalismo wahabista tanto como todos los demás países en ayuda al desarrollo. Omán, Abu Dhabi, los países del Golfo son un paraíso en comparación: las mujeres visten como quieren y puedes llevar una cruz en el cuello. Musharraf, admirador de Attaturk, hablaba de potenciar un «islam ilustrado». Yo sólo pido a Occidente que no tenga miedo: los islamistas huelen el miedo y acuden allí a derramar sangre. Atacaron a España porque la vieron débil, no porque tuviese tropas en Irak. Creo que el uso de la razón es lo único que cambiará al islam por dentro. Read more at www.minutodigital.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/ftzy

Um comentário à entrada anterior

A qual dá conta da constituição de uma Liga de Defesa da França (LDF) que se propõe fazer cumprir a lei francesa no que diz respeito à proibição de ocupar a via pública sem autorização das autoridade, coisa que alguns muçulmanos fazem semanalmente em vários locais de França. Queixam-se que não têm mesquitas suficientes (dá vontade de os mandar de volta para a terra deles: qualquer pessoas que tenha ido a países muçulmanos ter-se-á dado conta de que há mais mesquitas que mercados); e querem construí-las com dinheiros do tesouro francês!

O comentador prevê sarilhos, se realmente os membro da LDF concretizarem as suas intenções.

Amplify’d from vladtepesblog.com

A significant event in France.

The French Defence League, clearly an offshoot of the EDL or English Defence League, has issued a direct statement of intent to stop the regular shows of Muslim primacy in the Barbes district in France.

This means that large groups of organized vigilantes are doing something which as far as I know is unprecedented although perhaps not in the American West.

They are planning to actually enforce important laws against invaders and risk the wrath of the state itself for doing the job the state has chosen to consciously and deliberately neglect and ignore. One law specifically mentioned is the law of separation of church and state, the one mentioned is of 1905.

Other more banal laws might be the ones that guarantee French citizens reasonable access to their own roads and highways and access to and from their own homes, which Muslims have been blocking for years now with the flimsy excuse that they need to pray just then and there and for that amount of time.

The state will now likely take direct and harsh action against the LDF while ignoring the law breakers of the Muslim community, exactly as the British government is doing against the EDL and Tommy Robinson while actually financing various radical groups, in the case of Tower Hamlets, hundreds of millions of pounds sterling.

I predict this will be a volatile situation for any nation.

Eeyore for Vlad Read more at vladtepesblog.com

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/fsbq

A expulsão dos judeus dos países islâmicos, 1920-1970

Artigo extenso, do qual apresentamos o início para despertar o interesse do leitor:

Amplify’d from www.jcpa.org

The Expulsion of the Jews from Muslim Countries, 1920-1970: A History of Ongoing Cruelty and Discrimination

Shmuel Trigano

Between 1920 and 1970, 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab and other Muslim countries. The 1940s were a turning point in this tragedy; of those expelled, 600,000 settled in the new state of Israel, and 300,000 in France and the United States. Today, they and their descendents form the majority of the French Jewish community and a large part of Israel's population.

In the countries that expelled Jews, a combination of six legal, economic, and political measures aimed at isolating Jews in society was instituted: denationalization; legal discrimination; isolation and sequestration; economic despoilment; socioeconomic discrimination; and pogroms or similar acts.

It is the custom to say that Zionism was responsible for this development. However, the region's anti-Semitism would have developed even without the rise of the state of Israel because of Arab-Islamic nationalism, which resulted in xenophobia.

The fact that these events have been obscured has served in the campaign to delegitimize Israel, and therefore to a large extent, the same population that suffered this oppression. The fate of Palestinian refugees, their proclaimed innocence, and the injustice they endured form the main thrust of this delegitimization. The Jewish refugees have suffered more than the Palestinian refugees and undergone greater spoliations. However, they became citizens of the countries of refuge, especially Israel and France, while Palestinians were ostracized from the Arab nations.

Between 1920 and 1970, 900,000 Jews were expelled from Arab and other Muslim countries: from Morocco to Iran, from Turkey to Yemen, including  places where they had lived for twenty centuries. The 1940s were a turning point in this tragedy; of those expelled, 600,000 settled in the new state of Israel, and 300,000 in France and Canada. Today, they and their descendants form the majority of the French Jewish community and a large part of Israel's population.

How does one explain this exodus? It is the blind spot of contemporary political consciousness and an object of denial. There is not even an expression to name this major event. "The Forgotten Exodus" is the most commonly used term. But it actually masks the nature and impact of this historical event. "Forgotten" by whom, other than ideologues? "Exodus" is an apt description of the situation but not of its causes, which the adjective "forgotten" occults even more. For those who underwent the expulsion have not forgotten it at all. Moreover, it is also an important historical fact.

This is a major transnational phenomenon. Jewish communities were expelled either in their entirety or almost so. Communities of some significance remain in Iran, Turkey, Morocco, and Tunisia. All the countries that expelled Jews have one thing in common: they belong to Islam (including Turkey and Iran, which are not Arab countries). However, it is hard to view this exodus as a whole. It largely took place over a thirty-year period (1940-1970) and covered a huge geographical area, from Morocco to Iran, from Turkey to Yemen.

The "Statute of the Jews"

Nevertheless, if one compares the facts in the various countries[1] an identical model emerges: Jews were systematically expelled after a de facto "Statute of the Jews" was instituted. A combination of six legal, economic, and political measures aimed at isolating Jews in society was instituted:

Denationalization

Legal discrimination

Isolation and sequestration

Economic despoilment

Socioeconomic discrimination

Pogroms or similar acts

1)    The Denationalization of the Jews

The Jews were isolated from their society by a legal process in many lands.

This was the preliminary stage of their exclusion, which was followed by expulsion. A number of legal measures in various countries illustrate this point.

In Egypt the most articulate evolution occurred. It began with the Treaty of Sèvres (1920), a peace treaty between the Allies and the Ottomans that dismembered the Ottoman Empire and opened the way to the further creation of Arab (and Israeli) states. It addressed the question of nationality in Egypt and can be considered the first infringement of the rights of autochthonous Jews. The notion of belonging to a race (article 105) rather than a nation was introduced, thereby dissociating Jews from the majority of the population of the country. The next step was the nationality laws of 1927 and 1929, which favored jus sanguinis (or right of blood). An Egyptian was from then on defined as somebody who had Arab-Muslim affiliation.

The London Convention (1936) granted Egypt independence under King Farouk, and it was followed by a worsening of the nationality laws. According to additional nationality laws (in 1950, 1951, 1953, and 1956), autochthonous Jews became stateless: 40,000 people were turned into "foreigners" in their own country. In 1956, after the Sinai War, a new dimension was added: Egyptian nationality was taken away from anyone who committed acts in favor of enemy states or states with no relations with Egypt. In practice, all Jews were suspected of dual loyalty. This led ultimately to the accusation that all Jews were Zionists.

In Iraq, by the law of 9 May 1950, Jews who left Iraq were stripped of their nationality.

In Libya, the nationality laws of 12 June 1951 (art. 11, clause 27) decreed that the personal status of non-Muslims would be governed by their (religious) courts, in the manner of dhimmis during the premodern period. Jews were no longer allowed to vote or to hold political office.

2) Legal discrimination

A number of legal measures imposed restrictions on businesses and associations. Jewish communities and organizations were placed under supervision. Arabic became the sole language of public services.

In Libya, in 1953, Jews were subjected to restrictions and became victims of economic boycotts. The Maccabi sports club was forcibly opened to Arab members in 1954. A decree was issued on 9 May 1957 obliging Libyans with relatives in Israel to register at the Libyan boycott office, even though at that point, 90 percent of the Jews had already left. On 3 December 1958, Tripoli's Jewish community ceased to be an independent entity. Thereafter it was overseen by a state-appointed commissioner. Legal exclusion worsened. In 1960, Jews were prohibited from acquiring new possessions. They were no longer allowed to vote, hold public office, or serve in the army or the police. On 2 April 1960, Alliance Israélite Universelle schools were closed.

Similar developments occurred in Lebanon. As early as 1947, Jewish students were expelled from Beirut University. Jewish "Zionist" organizations (such as the Maccabi sports club) were forbidden. Jews were discharged from public service positions and Jewish youth movements banned.

In Iraq, Jewish history and Hebrew language instruction were prohibited in Jewish schools during the 1920s. Jews were expelled from public service and education in the 1930s. The Jewish schools' curricula were censored in 1932.

In Iran, Zionist activities (differentiated from "Jewish" activities) were banned in 1979. In 2000, discrimination developed in public service, universities, and public companies.

In Yemen, sharia law was instated in 1913, worsening the situation of the dhimmi. Decrees specifying forced conversion for orphans were issued between  1922 and 1928, while Jews were excluded from public service positions and the army.

In Syria, real estate purchase was prohibited to Jews in 1947, and Jews began to be discharged from public service positions. In 1967, Muslim principals were appointed to Jewish schools.

In Morocco, after independence in 1956, a process of Arabization of public services began, cutting the Jews off from the larger society. A dahir (decree) Moroccanizing Jewish charitable organizations was issued on 26 November 1958, endangering their freedom.

In Egypt, a long process of discrimination in the public service began in 1929. In 1945-1948, Jews were excluded from the public service. In 1947, Jewish schools were put under surveillance and forced to Arabize and Egyptianize their curricula. Community organizations were forced to submit their member lists to the Egyptian state after May 1948 and until 1950. In 1949, Jews were forbidden to live in the vicinity of King Farouk's palaces.

In Tunisia, a law concerning Judaism (11 July 1958) put an end to Jewish communities, replaced them with temporary "Israelite worship commissions," and suppressed the personal status of the Jews (inherited from the dhimmi status, which obliged the Jews to depend on their religious tribunals for all matters related to their personal status). In Tunisia too, independence (1956) led to the Tunisification of public services.

Turkey under the Young Turks (1923-1945) created hard-labor battalions for non-Muslim conscripts in May 1941. Read more at www.jcpa.org

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/fqg1

Ministério da Administração interna dos EUA pondera aceitar sugestão dos muçulmanos

A sugestão é esta: em vez de serem revistadas nos aeroportos norte-americanos, as mulheres muçulmanas revistam-se a si próprias.

Pura sandice, da perigosa.

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

The Department of Homeland Security needs to clarify its position here without delay. CAIR advised Muslim women in the press release quoted here that:

"Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area"...

Two facts should be self-evident to demonstrate how outrageous this idea is. First, the whole point of being searched by someone else is to find concealed objects. A "self-pat-down" clearly defeats that purpose and is a completely unacceptable lapse in security. Let's remember the stakes here: if something goes wrong in air security in the wrong place at the wrong time, people die. There is enough margin for error in the system already without adding this variable.

Secondly, the fact that Napolitano could even be considering such a measure highlights a double standard for special treatment that would not be considered for any other religious group, but is extended to Muslims without a second thought. What is going on here is a politically correct sort of anti-profiling: by all appearances, the air security apparatus bends over backwards to profile Muslims as not being a threat, in a way that it does not strive to reassure other demographic groups in the traveling public.

We are told time and again that Muslims in America just want to be treated like everyone else. Ergo, if you want equal treatment as a Muslim woman, participate in your social responsibilities equally even when it is awkward or inconvenient, rather than acting like some kind of demigoddess whose head and neck are untouchable by sullied human hands in the screening line. Your head and neck are as human as that of the next non-Muslim lady in line who is no more thrilled to be there than you are.

But let's remember why we're standing there waiting with our shoes in a plastic bin, and why so many security procedures have come into being in the first place: Islamic jihadists keep trying to bring down our planes, more and more with explosives concealed on their bodies.

"Napolitano considering allowing Muslim women to pat themselves down at Airports!" by Jack Minor for the Greeley Gazette, November 17 (thanks to C.):

With the holidays fast approaching, the Transportation Safety Agency has announced new security procedures requiring passengers selected for secondary screening to go through a machine that produces a full body scan producing a nude but grainy, black and white image. Passengers choosing to opt out of the scan will face a full body pat.

The problems these security measures pose should be discussed in the interest of the entire traveling public, pilots, and flight attendants, and not as the problem of one group.

The head of Homeland Security has indicated the government is considering the request of an Islamic organization that has suggested Muslim women be allowed to pat themselves down during a full body search that is part of new enhanced procedures at airports.

Since implementing the procedures, numerous complaints have arisen that the search is not a "pat-down" but rather feeling and grabbing along a person's genitalia and other areas until they meet resistance. Critics have said the pat-downs would be considered sexual assault if performed elsewhere.

The TSA defends the procedures as necessary in light of last years "underwear bomber" and the recent issues involving printer cartridges being used in an attempt to blow up cargo planes.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR, has expressed concern with the TSA over the regulations and recommended special procedures for dealing with Muslim women. The organization issued a travel advisory for Muslims over the procedure.

In the advisory CAIR advises all Muslims to contact them and file a complaint with the TSA if they experience any "disturbing incidents" with the new procedures and they feel they have been unfairly singled out for screening.

It goes on to make special recommendations for Muslim women wearing a hijab covering their face. The advisory says women are to inform the officer they are only to pat down the head and neck and says "They should not subject you to a full-body or partial body pat-down." They also recommend that women should be permitted to pat themselves down and "have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands."

Barack Obama's Homeland Security Czar, Janet Napolitano, is considering changes to the procedures to address the issues raised by CAIR.... Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/fp9x