4.3.11

Jihad em Frankfurt: mais do mesmo

Ataque islâmico e negação ocidental: persistimos em não fazer caso ao que os mujahidin dizem: estão em guerra connosco porque somos «infiéis».

Excerto. Lede tudo:

Amplify’d from frontpagemag.com

Like so many jihad plots and actual jihad attacks and attempted attacks these days, the jihad murder of two U.S. airmen and the wounding of two others outside the Frankfurt Airport in Germany Wednesday was initially dismissed as having nothing to do with terrorism. According to the German news agency DAPD, Boris Rhein, the interior minister for the German state of Hesse hurried to the airport and almost immediately declared that there were no indications that the shootings had been a terror attack.

One wonders what actually would constitute a terrorist attack for such analysts. Would the murderer have to announce that he was about to carry out a terrorist attack before he started shooting? Would he have to be carrying an al-Qaeda membership card? In the case of the Frankfurt Airport shooting, there were, in fact, numerous indications that this was a jihad attack. The murderer was Arif Uka, a Kosovar Muslim. Despite widespread assumptions among American analysts that Kosovar Muslims are mostly moderate, secular, peaceful, Westernized, and grateful for U.S. intervention on their behalf, in reality al-Qaeda and other jihad terror groups have been active in that region for over a decade.

And even aside from the possibility of an actual link to al-Qaeda, Muslim hardliners have been streaming into Kosovo and the neighboring regions for just as long, and have been challenging on Islamic grounds the relatively secularized and non-combative Islam of the native Muslims. What’s more, Arif Uka is twenty-one years old and lives in Frankfurt, which has long been a hotbed of jihad activity in Germany.

As Uka opened fire, he shouted “Allahu akbar,” the universal cry of jihadis worldwide which Muhammad Atta reminded his fellow 9/11 hijackers to shout as they began operations, since, he said, the sound of it struck terror into the hearts of unbelievers. Another report suggests that he shouted “jihad, jihad.”

Nor would this be the first jihad attack against Americans by a Kosovar Muslim. Stratfor Global Intelligence reports: “A number of Albanian individuals were part of the Fort Dix plot in the United States in 2007. U.S. authorities broke up a militant cell in North Carolina that involved an individual of ethnic Albanian origin. In 2009, a U.S. citizen of Albanian descent from Brooklyn, New York, tried to go to Pakistan for militant training.”

Barack Obama quickly issued a statement saying, “I want everybody to understand that we will spare no effort in learning how this outrageous act took place, and in working with German authorities to ensure that all of the perpetrators are brought to justice.” Yet it is absolutely certain that if Arif Uka turns out to have been a pious, devout Muslim who read the Qur’an and cited it as a justification for the idea that Muslims have a responsibility to fight against infidels, that is one lead that Barack Obama will not follow up. No matter how many Muslim gunmen shout “Allahu akbar” as they open fire on non-Muslims, at this point the dogmatic lines have been drawn: analysts in the top military and intelligence posts in the U.S. and Europe understand that Islam is a religion of peace that has been hijacked by a tiny minority of extremists, and they have been taught to understand that that fact somehow frees them from the obligation of understanding the enemy’s belief-system and formulating effective ways to combat it.

Read more at frontpagemag.com
 

«Deus=Alá?»

Um post do diabo:

Amplify’d from bloggingsatan.com

God = Allah

A great lie here, my servants.  My great lie.

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Yes, I love the Huffington Post’s religion section.  It represents the pinnacle of my post-modern “you have your truth, I have mine” approach to religion.

In today’s article by Miroslav Volf, entitled Do Christians and Muslims Worship the Same God, can you guess where good ol’ Miroslav comes out?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Hey, why don’t Muslims go to a local Baptist church?  If they worship the same God, they should feel comfortable worshiping in the same places with their fellow worshipers?  Right?

The God of Christianity, my servants, the God who created you and me, is a triune Godhead, of which Jesus Christ is on person, equally God of Gods, who said, “before Abraham was I AM.”

Is this the God of Muslims?

Ha ha ha ha ha.

Believe it, my servants.

Read more at bloggingsatan.com
 

Etiópia: muçulmanos queimam igrejas

Note-se que a Etiópia é um país maioritariamente cristão.

Developing: Ethiopian Muslims Burn Down Five Churches, More Attacks Feared

Church Leaders Ask for Government Protection from the Ongoing Muslim Attacks
Washington, D.C. (March 3, 2011)-International Christian Concern (ICC) has learned that in the past two days, thousands of Muslims have razed five churches and the homes of two evangelists in Asendabo, Ethiopia. Christian leaders are asking for protection after the Muslim attackers continued burning churches even after the federal police were sent to the town. 

The Muslims started the attacks yesterday after falsely accusing the Christians of desecrating the Qur'an. More than ten thousand Muslims shouted "Allah Akbar" (Allah is great) as they burned down five evangelical churches. The government sent the federal police force to protect the Christians after the Muslims burned down the first three churches. The Muslims overwhelmed the police force and burned down two more churches today.

Speaking with ICC, Christian leaders expressed their fear that Muslims will start killing the Christians unless the government sends more security forces to contain the Muslim attackers.

At the time of the writing of this report, none of the Muslim attackers have been arrested. The government officials detained some Christians and took them to the nearby Jimma town stating that they need to do that for their own security.

Ethiopia is a Christian majority country and was one of the first nations to accept Christianity. However, in the areas of the country where Muslims are the majority, Christians face attacks. 

"We urge Ethiopian government forces to send reinforcement to protect the Christians in the city of Asendabo from the Muslim attacks. We ask Christians around the world to prevent any further attacks by calling the Ethiopian officials in their countries and asking them to protect the Christians and their property," said ICC's Regional Manager for Africa, Jonathan Racho.

Please urgently contact the Ethiopian officials in your country and urge them to send more security forces to protect the Christians from the Muslim attacks.

Ethiopian Embassies:

USA 202 364 1200
Canada 416 482 6637
Germany 493077206
UK 020 78383897/020 7838 3898
Read more at campaign.r20.constantcontact.com
 

3.3.11

«Um verdadeiro mártir»

Amplify’d from espectadores.blogspot.com
Shahbaz Bhatti, Ministro paquistanês para as Minorias, foi hoje assassinado em Islamabad. Bhatti era um dos mais notórios críticos da infame Lei da Blasfémia, que pune com a pena de morte o insulto ao Islão. Bhatti, um católico, fora recebido em Setembro do ano passado por Bento XVI. No local do crime, a polícia encontrou panfletos, supostamente da autoria de um grupo paquistanês com ligações à Al-Qaeda, nos quais se ameaça de morte os críticos da Lei da Blasfémia.

Este é um exemplo de um verdadeiro mártir. Devido ao terrorismo, vemos muitas vezes a palavra "mártir" surgir nos "media" em contextos totalmente desadequados. O mártir não é um tarado que mata em nome de Deus. É o exacto oposto. O mártir é aquele que não teme perder a sua vida por amor a Deus, para ser coerente e fiel a Cristo e à verdade de Cristo até ao fim, até ao dom da sua própria vida, se necessário. O martírio não é suicídio, nem é homicídio. O martírio é o gesto último e derradeiro de amor a Deus e ao próximo.

Vítima de uma morte cruenta, por causa das suas convicções cristãs e por causa da sua batalha por leis mais justas e pelos direitos humanos, Shahbaz Bhatti merece ser contado entre os justos de Deus. Sobre estes justos, falou Cristo nestes termos: "O Rei dirá, então, aos da sua direita: 'Vinde, benditos de meu Pai! Recebei em herança o Reino que vos está preparado desde a criação do mundo'» (São Mateus, 25:34).


Que os anjos te conduzam ao Paraíso,
Que os mártires te acolham à tua chegada
E te introduzam na cidade santa de Jerusalém.
Que o coro dos anjos te receba,
E com Lázaro, outrora pobre,
tenhas o eterno descanso.
Read more at espectadores.blogspot.com
 

Greenfield e o avanço do islão nos EUA

Destaque:
«The Islamists could have been stopped yesterday. They can still be stopped today. But tomorrow the cost will be much higher, if it will even be possible at all. Each passing year erodes our power and grows theirs. The balance of power has already shifted in the minds of our leaders. But it will shift in reality as well. The difference between a mad dream and a terrible reality is power. Alone Charles Manson was another lunatic drinking deep of the poisoned well of his own power fantasies. With only a few women and men, he terrorized California. And the evil we face now makes Manson seem as harmless as a stuffed bunny.

History's monsters were rarely geniuses, most often they were men with a bad idea, willing to do absolutely anything to see it through. Islam is a very bad idea that breeds monsters. It has all the usual components of of the "Bad Ideas" that nearly destroyed humanity in the 20th century. Absolute power in the name of a perfect order, conspiracy theories and the rise of the oppressed.»

Lede tudo!

Amplify’d from sultanknish.blogspot.com
A Muslim group has announced plans to cover the Statue of Liberty with a burqa and then replace her with a minaret. But there's no reason at all to take such plans seriously. Lady Liberty being treated the way the Muslim world treats women in general, is as unlikely as a massive mosque being built just downwind of Ground Zero. Or Queen Elizabeth donning a hijab on a visit to Abu Dhabi. It's one of those things that we're told not to worry about until it happens and then objecting to it becomes a crime against tolerance. The tolerance of intolerance.
In Germany, a Kosovar Muslim airport employee cried, "Allahu Akbar" and opened fire on a group of US airmen. Of course the motive has yet to be determined, and after a long period of speculation touching on everything from his mortgage problems to his scratchy uniform, the truth will be known and quietly buried, along with the two men he killed. Little more than a decade ago, the United States Air Force was instrumental in helping create a terrorist state for Kosovar Muslims. This is the gratitude they got in return. A hail of bullets. And this is the gratitude that Westerners can always expect for their aid.
Anjem Choudary, the leader of the Islamic group that would like to sandblast Lady Liberty, and Arid Uka, the airport gunmen, were not hatched in some cave in Pakistan. Choudary was born in the London Borough of Bexley. Arid Uka was born and raised in Germany, where his family had lived for some 40 years. They are not immigrants, but native born European Muslims fighting to remake Europe into an Islamic state. The idea is fanciful, just like the Statue of Liberty being blown up by the American Taliban to make way for a minaret. But there was a time when a short Austrian corporal's plans to build a Thousand Year Reich on the bones of Europe were as laughable as Choudary's antics.
In 1993, Americans laughed at a gang of stupid Muslim terrorists who had tried to blow up the World Trade Center using a Ryder rental van, and then actually tried to get their deposit back on the van. 8 years later a gang of terrorists not all that much smarter than them hijacked four planes with box cutters and knocked down both towers, killing 3,000 people. And suddenly it wasn't funny anymore.
Evil is often ridiculous in its pretensions, but horrifying in its execution. It is silly only until it begins to succeed, and then the joke turns to horror and madness. We may find Kim Jong Il funny, but no one in North Korea does. Saddam's love poems, Stalin's toupee, Hitler's comic bellicosity, Khaddafi's eccentricity are funny only because we never lived under them. The presumptuousness of a Choudary presuming to wave the flag of Islam over the White House and announce plans for dynamiting the Statue of Liberty is a joke. But the punchline is how little we are doing to halt the day when it really does fly over the White House.
"All that is required for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing." But our governments are not doing nothing, they are aiding it along. European leaders grumble about multiculturalism and call for more integration. Choudary and Arid Uka are the successes of their integration. The politicians talk and the refugees swarm and the mosques spread. Most European Muslims are not going out guns blazing or cursing returning soldiers. They don't need to. They can do the math better than the politicians can. And they already know they will win.
We don't have the same demographic gun to our heads yet, but we are retreating almost as quickly. In the aftermath of 9/11, the temerity of a Ground Zero mosque was unthinkable. Now it's not only thinkable, it's downright mandatory. And does anyone really believe that Barack Hussein Obama could have been elected at any other period in history, but the one in which our relations with the Muslim world have become of paramount importance?
This is how craven we have become in the face of enemies armed only with box cutters, IED's and the occasional RPG. But the days of the suicide bomb are passing, and the day of the suicide nuke is coming.
Read more at sultanknish.blogspot.com
 

Alemanha: soldados americanos abatidos a tiro; homicida gritou «Allahu akbar»

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

Frankfurt Airport murderer shouted either "Jihad Jihad" or "Allahu Akbar"

So says ABC News, which so far is one of the few mainstream media outlets even to deign to inform its readers that the murderer shouted anything at all.

"Gunman Shouting 'Allah Akbar' Kills 2 US Airmen in Germany," by Luis Martinez and Richard Esposito for ABC News, March 2 (thanks to Ravi):

A gunman shouting "Allah Akbar" opened fire on a bus carrying U.S. airmen in Frankfurt, Germany, killing two and wounding two others before his gun jammed and he was subdued, officials said.

An ethnic Albanian from Kosovo was taken into custody and the FBI was heading an investigation because U.S. citizens were killed and to determine whether the shooting was an act of terrorism.

It is not clear even what they mean by that at this point. What actually would constitute a terrorist attack? Would the murderer have to announce that he was about to carry out a terrorist attack before he started shooting? Would he have to be carrying an al-Qaeda membership card?

In reality, he cried, "Allahu akbar" and possibly "Jihad, jihad." It was a jihad attack. But of course we are not defending ourselves against the global jihad, so that is a point of no significance.

President Obama made an unscheduled appearance to say, "I am saddened and I am outraged by this attack" and U.S. investigators would work with German authorities and "spare no effort" to ensure that "all of the perpetrators are brought to justice."

He added that the killings were a "stark reminder of the extraordinary sacrifices" of American servicemembers.

Sources told ABC News that the gunman boarded a shuttle bus at the Frankfurt airport. The bus was marked United States Air Force and was carrying 13 or 14 people, plus the driver.

When he opened fire, the gunman shouted "Allah Akbar," according to sources. He fired nine times, killling two and critically wounding two others before the gun jammed and he was subdued by other passengers. While being wrestled into submission, the suspect shouted either "Jihad Jihad" or "Allah Akbar," sources said....

The gunman was identifed by sources to ABC News as Arif Uka, a Kosovo citizen from the northern town of Mitrovica....

Read more at www.jihadwatch.org
 

1.3.11

Nigéria: mujahidin atacam aldeia cristã: matam mãe e 4 filhos

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org
"Attack kills four in central Nigeria: military," from AFP, February 28 (thanks to Weasel Zippers):
JOS, Nigeria — An overnight attack has killed at least four people in tense central Nigeria, a region regularly hit by violence between Christian and Muslim ethnic groups, the military said Monday.

The pre-dawn attack occured in Dabwak, a mainly Christian village near the flashpoint city of Jos.

"There are four killed," Brigadier General Hassan Umaru, commander of a military unit deployed in the area, told AFP.

Locals said five people -- a mother and four children -- were shot and killed, blaming Fulani Muslims for the attack.

"It's the Fulanis that came shooting. They killed... my mother-in-law, three of my brothers-in-law and my sister-in-law," said a woman before breaking down on the phone and hanging up.

Umaru said "any attack in the fringes of this area is suspected to be by Fulanis." No arrests had been made....

Read more at www.jihadwatch.org
 

28.2.11

Gaza: cristão atacado por alegado proselitismo

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org
A prominent Christian surgeon in the Gaza Strip said assailants threw a bomb at his vehicle and sent him threatening messages.

Dr. Maher Ayyad, 55, says no one was hurt in Friday's bombing, though the explosion damaged his brother's vehicle.

He said Sunday that after the blast, he received text messages to halt evangelical work or face harsh punishment. Ayyad says he does not preach his faith....

somehow these assailants got the crazy idea that Islam forbids non-Muslims to proselytize among Muslims.

Marisol commented on this story here, but I thought I'd remark on the cognitive dissonance between this (and so many other stories like it in the Islamic world) and what Islamic spokesmen in the West tell gullible non-Muslim audiences about Islam. "Gaza assailants plant bomb under Christian car: Dr. Maher Ayyad say received text messages to halt evangelical work or face harsh punishment," from the Associated Press, February 27 (thanks to Kevin):

Read more at www.jihadwatch.org
 

Erdogan diz ao turcos na Alemanha: «intregai-vos mas não vos deixeis assimilar»

Thousands of Turkish immigrants gave Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan a rock star welcome in Germany on Sunday in a show of national pride that remains fervent, even after decades spent in Germany. He told them they remain part of Turkey, and urged them to integrate into German society -- but not to assimilate.
See more at womenagainstshariah.blogspot.com
 

27.2.11

Espanha: juiz suspenso «por ser católico»

É o progresso:

Suspendido, según el TSJ, por retrasar una adopción a una lesbiana. Él sostiene que fue por «indagar los efectos en una menor de tener dos "mamás"».
Hace tres años el Juez Fernando Ferrín Calamita fue sentenciado e inhabilitado como juez, con una sentencia que fue considerada injusta, desproporcionada y un aviso a navegantes para los que pretendan ser mártires de la coherencia.
- ¿Cuántos años de pena le quedan? ¿Tiene intenciones de reincorporarse a la carrera judicial?
- Hoy, día 19 de febrero, cumplo tres años de pena. Me quedan siete, puesto que el tribunal supremo (así, con minúscula) me condenó a diez años de inhabilitación para ser juez. Y todo por tratar de indagar los efectos en una menor de tener dos “mamás”. Pero en febrero de 2018 no me podré reincorporar, puesto que requisito para ello es carecer de antecedentes penales, y la anotación que yo tengo en el Registro Central de Penados caduca a los tres años. Es decir, en febrero de 2021 podría solicitar mi reingreso al servicio activo.
La verdad es que si no renuncio a la carrera judicial es por mi mujer y mis siete hijos. No puedo tirar por la borda seis años de trabajo (los jueces nos jubilamos a los setenta años), y, por tanto, de cotización a la Seguridad Social.
- Lleva una larga trayectoria en la carrera judicial. ¿Por qué quiso ser juez?
- Este año 2011 cumpliría 25 años en la carrera judicial. Entré con toda la ilusión del mundo, dispuesto a servir, a ver personas con problemas (no papeles), e intentar resolverlos de la mejor manera posible; especialmente en el Juzgado de Familia, en donde se tocan verdaderos dramas humanos, en los que los verdaderos perjudicados son los niños.
Yo siempre, desde joven, quise estudiar Derecho y ser juez. Jamás se me ocurrió pensar que en la justicia había cloacas, y que jueces, abogados, fiscales, me iban a llamar por teléfono exigiéndome que me fuera del Juzgado; dinero, a cambio de retirar la querella; que mandara un escrito a un fax y archivarían el caso, etc.
- ¿Se esperaba usted lo qué le ha ocurrido? ¿Cree que ha sufrido un castigo por ser católico y cumplir como juez justo?
- A uno el “edificio”, todos los esquemas mentales, se le derrumban. ¿Cómo puede ser posible que me ocurra esto, con la Constitución que tenemos, en la que se dice que un juez es inamovible e independiente? Para esas personas, el ser católico inhabilita para ser juez de Familia. Increíble. Habrá que colocar al frente de tales Juzgados a robots, que no piensen. Al fin y al cabo, como para pedir el divorcio sólo hace falta que hayan transcurrido tres meses desde la celebración del divorcio, un ordenador puede perfectamente calcular el tiempo y “soltar” por la impresora la sentencia de divorcio. Y como hoy también hay tablas de cuantificación de las pensiones alimenticias para los hijos y compensatoria para la mujer (que es el principal caballo de batalla de los pleitos matrimoniales), nada obsta a sustituir como digo a los jueces de familia por robots o por buenos ordenadores: se introducen en el PC los datos relativos al número de hijos e ingresos de los progenitores, y el sistema calcula la pensión. Vendría muy bien, para ahorrar.

Yo tengo claro quién ha antepuesto sus ideas y/o se ha dejado presionar. Yo desde luego no he antepuesto mis creencias, y la prueba es que he dictado miles de sentencias de divorcio, aunque personalmente esté en contra del mismo. Acertaron en lo de católico porque estadísticamente la mayoría de los españoles lo somos, aunque si fuese verdad en la proporción que dicen las estadísticas, y fuésemos coherentes, “otro gallo nos cantaría”.
- Usted ha intentado defenderse judicialmente ¿podría detallarnos como ha sido el proceso?
- Dentro de unos días presentaré la demanda ante el Tribunal Europeo de Estrasburgo…y a esperar.
Todas las acciones legales emprendidas han fracasado. Ni siquiera se han admitido a trámite las querellas presentadas, salvo la dirigida contra el Gabinete Psicosocial del Juzgado (se admitió, se practicaron diligencias, y se ha archivado). No merece la pena, por lo visto, investigar si es cierto que el juez instructor del caso, Abadía Vicente, me mandó dos intermediarios amigos comunes para ofrecerme la posibilidad de librarme del banquillo y de una sentencia condenatoria si mandaba un fax comprometiéndome a marcharme de Murcia. Tampoco si J.L. Mazón me exigió a través de López Bernal y de Antonio Rentero 10.000 euros y que me fuera de Murcia para retirar la querella, a lo que el Fiscal Superior pondría el “visto”. No merece tampoco la pena que el Consejo General del Poder Judicial investigue la conducta de Juan Martínez Moya, el que concurriendo causa de abstención (por haberme incoado expediente por el mismo objeto, y que luego resulta que preside la Sala encargada de enjuiciarme), no lo hace (lo que es falta muy grave, por la que verbigracia expulsaron de la carrera judicial a una jueza de Marbella).

- ¿Qué opina sobre el estado de la Justicia?
- En fin. Es una pena cómo está la justicia. Sólo he tenido un juicio, por jueces parciales. El tribunal supremo no me motiva las razones de la agravación de la condena, (uno de ellos “off the record” reconoció mi inocencia), y el tribunal constitucional no me admite a trámite el recurso de amparo “por falta de relevancia constitucional”, sin decirme tampoco las razones…

Es como si a un policía le echan del Cuerpo por investigar un delito, sin darle explicaciones. Está cumpliendo su deber…
- ¿Ha tenido alguna respuesta de otros jueces ante lo ocurrido con Usted, o se ha sentido desprotegido?
- Un “hándicap” que he tenido: no pertenecer a ninguna asociación profesional. Pertenecí hace tiempo a la APM, pero a raíz del “acuerdo” al que llegó con Aznar (el cual en su programa propugnaba la vuelta al sistema de elección de los vocales del CGPJ anterior a 1985), me dí de baja. Un “compañero” afiliado a ella (miembro de ese tribunal supremo) me dijo que si me volvía a dar de alta “me protegerían”. No sé por qué me vino a la memoria la película “El padrino”.
- A propósito de lo que le ha ocurrido, ¿cree que es una anécdota desgraciada o es la tónica habitual en España?
- Lo dicho: qué pena de país. Lo dijo Alfonso Guerra hace 30 años: “a España no la va a reconocer ni la madre que la parió” y “el que se mueva no sale en la foto”. Yo, parece ser que me moví… Y me seguiré moviendo y luchando por mis derechos.
Read more at www.religionenlibertad.com
 

«Europe's problem is not multiculturalism, but that it has been invaded and it has forgotten how to fight back»

Daniel Greenfield dixit.
Leia tudo:

Amplify’d from sultanknish.blogspot.com
France's President Sarkozy has stated that multiculturalism has failed, insisting that Muslim immigrants merge into the "national community". German President Angela Merkel made virtually the same statement earlier at her party's convention. British PM David Cameron went further saying that Islamism had taken root because multiculturalism had diminished a collective English identity. All three leaders are conservatives and language like this has been greeted with applause by their base. But there is really very little to cheer here.
Announcing the failure of multiculturalism in Europe of 2011 is as relevant a disclosure as the comic French song, Tout Va Très Bien, Madame La Marquise, in which the groom informs her ladyship that her husband had committed suicide after losing his money and burned down the estate, by telling her that everything was alright except for a minor mishap with her horse. Multiculturalism may be the post-national left's favorite nag, but the failure here is much greater. It is mass migration from the Muslim world that is the problem, and any policy that only addresses the consequences, rather than the cause, is bound to be a failure.
Of the three leaders, Cameron was the only to lay out something close to a policy. But his muscular rhetoric sounds suspiciously like the pre-election Sarkozy. And conservative British pols have developed a habit of talking tough about Islam one minute, and pandering to it shamelessly for votes on the other. Before becoming Prime Minister, Cameron went to live with a Muslim family and announced that, "Not for the first time, I found myself thinking that it is mainstream Britain which needs to integrate more with the British Asian way of life, not the other way around."

Has Cameron suddenly realized that the extended Muslim family with its rugs and hospitality masks less appetizing cultural problems, particularly when it comes to the treatment of women, or is he trying to stay ahead of a public backlash. Sarkozy certainly is. His popularity is low. Meanwhile LePen's daughter is behind a revived party, without her father's Nazi sympathies and anti-semitism, that may take away enough votes to make a difference. Merkel is also unpopular and needs a red meat issue that will distract the voters from Greece and Portugal. And so for all that European leaders are talking about the threat of Islamic separatism, and the Palestinization of Muslim communities with their No Go zones, honor killings and riots, they are still speaking the language of integration.

Integration. Process the millions of Muslims through British, Germany and French schools and make sure that they know the national language, rather than the urban patois that has become the lingua franca of a changing Europe, showing up in rap albums and TV shows. Teach them how wonderfully tolerant we are, bridge the gap by celebrating their culture, and maybe even making room for a little Sharia law on the side. Tie the knot and there'll be a happy integrated nation, which marries the Middle Eastern values of hospitality and the British values of not beheading your daughter.

The problem with this new anthem of 'Tout va Très Bien Madame la Multiculturalisma' is that multiculturalism isn't the problem, it's the symptom. The British, French and German systems haven't failed, they have had a chance of success. It would have been possible to integrate a few thousand Muslims per country, but not a few million. Certainly not people who have no definition of integration, and whose cultural and religious assumptions are so far apart that they cannot integrate without losing their identity.

But even this need not have been a complete and absolute disaster. 3 million Nepalese might have made their own separate communities, as they have in towns such as Reading, without it leading to a civil war. The natives would have complained of the smells, the foreign languages and the strange signs. Of entire English towns in the hands of strangers. And it would have ended at that. But Muslims are a special case for three unfortunate reasons.
First, they hold an enduring grievance toward Europe for everything over the last 1000 years. Considering the troubles in Northern Ireland between peoples far more closely related by culture and blood, who in their right mind thought that it would be a good idea to import millions of foreigners who still resent the loss of Spain, the Crusades and colonial governments with nearly equal ferocity, and imagined that it would all go smoothly.

Second, their culture is tightly integrated with their religion, and their religion has a long history of expanding through conquest. A history both ancient and recent. It took enormous arrogance to import millions of members whose civilization still employs violence as a religiously sanctioned tool for promoting the faith, and then act as if they could be integrated with a good lesson plan.
Third, many Muslim countries have enormous wealth and influence, and have used it to promote Islamism and tear down the defenses of Western nations. Imagine if the Soviet Union had possessed enormous oil wealth or if Japan in the 80's had decided to use its wealth to aggressively promote a cultural takeover. That is what we are dealing with here.

All this talk of integrating Muslims disregards them as a civilization, and treats them as if they were delinquents. Cameron's talk of youth falling into extremism suggests that he thinks of them as if they were children from a broken home falling through the cracks of the system and shooting up heroin on council estates, rather than young men acting in accord with the values of their own religion.
The Muslim terrorists of Europe are neither impoverished nor marginalized. They are doctors, architects and university students who have taken the full benefit of what the countries have to offer them, and gone to war to win it all. They are brats acting out, but soldiers engaging in a war of conquest. A simple fact that all the integration prattle obscures.

The difference between the so-called extremists and the moderates, is that the extremists want to conquer Europe by force, and the moderates through demographics and culture. The extremists want to blow up Europe. The moderates want to integrate it. And their lesson plans have gotten much further into the European, Canadian, Australian and American child-- than the lesson plans of the Western integrators have into the Muslim child.
Cameron has rightly identified a portion of the problem. But his solution is asinine. You do not create a vigorous culture worthy of respect by passing a law and making it so. A culture that merits respect can only be created by the measure of its accomplishments. The decline of English culture parallels the physical recession of the nation, its power, its industry and its achievements. (And that is a fair warning for America, which is headed down the same path at a slower pace.) A lesson plan on King Alfred the Great, will not make England great, and will not earn Muslim respect, let alone their integration. Most nations have their own grand histories and their own tales. But unless they still have greatness within them, these are nothing but matters of trivia.

Talk all you want of greatness, but great nations colonize, they are not colonized. All a UK Muslim needs to do in order to gauge where the future lies is look at the native birth rate, at the Muslim birth rate and at the immigration statistics. And then he can safely relegate King Alfred the Great, Lord Nelson and Winston Churchill to the realm of obscure trivia from a vanishing nation. After all Byzantium too was great in its time, but now it's a giant Muslim marketplace.
The Middle East was once the cradle of civilization, today it is a heap of dirt with a smattering of oil, olive groves and vast dirty slum carrying the names of once legendary cities. The region was full of cultures and civilizations that were once great, before being trodden under the boots of maddened Bedouin fanatics. Today only two, the Jews and the Persians, exist as independent nations. And it would not take all that long to turn Europe into the new Middle East.
The integrators imagine that they can halt that process with a reading of 'The Charge of the Light Brigade' or by banning the burqa, but the tide of history is not turned so easily as that. The great men of England's own history could tell Cameron that. It is not history that makes nations great, but the way in which they carry on that history into the present. The way in which they realize that history in the present day.

Say what you will about Muslims, but they are realizing their history in Europe today. While they reenact the old battles, their foes are tempting them with social services funding. European governments want Muslims to join their republican secular states. Muslims want Europeans to join their caliphate. And it is not difficult to see who will win that particular contest if things go on as they are.

Reporting the failure of multiculturalism is a touch of Tout Va Très Bien, Madame La Marquise by the integrators who are comically understating the scope and the nature of the problem. Europe's problem is not multiculturalism, but that it has been invaded and it has forgotten how to fight back.
Read more at sultanknish.blogspot.com
 

26.2.11

Espanha: Síndrome da Jihad Súbita

Note-se que o El País não diz que o indivíduo é muçulmano, referindo-se-lhe como um «perturbado». É correcto e o nome da perturbação é «islão»!
Note-se como o El País afirma que o acto não foi premeditado. Claro que não: o homem ia a passar à porta do centro de saúde com o seu machado debaixo do braço e deu-lhe uma coisa, entrou, atacou duas administrativas com o machado, amputando-lhes dedos, e uma enfermeira, cortando o escalpe às três.
Note-se que o El País tinha que desculpabilizar o assassino (em forma tentada, pelo menos) cantando a canção do «coitadinho que está desempregado». Como se sabe, o desemprego leva ao homicídio a sangue frio.
A esta atitude do El País pode chamar-se ódio ao Ocidente e dhimmitude.

Via Bare Naked Islam, onde se dá conta de que este é o segundo caso de Síndrome da Jihad Súbita em poucos dias.

Un hombre ha irrumpido esta mañana armado con un hacha de grandes dimensiones en un centro de salud de Fuenlabrada (Madrid) y ha atacado al personal ya los pacientes. El agresor, identificado como AEB, de 40 años, nacionalidad marroquí y vecino de la localidad, ha herido a tres trabajadoras del ambulatorio El Naranjo antes de ser detenido por un joven que estaba en el centro de salud esperando a que atendieran a su mujer.Las heridas son dos administrativas y una enfermera y las tres se encuentran en estado grave, aunque no se teme por sus vidas. La Consejería de Sanidad ha convocado una reunión urgente de la Mesa Sectorial - compuesta por los sindicatos Satse, Femyts, CC OO, UGT y CSIT-UP- para informar de lo sucedido el lunes día 28.
Un testigo ha explicado que el hombre ha entrado con el hacha escondida bajo una sudadera que portaba sobre su brazo derecho, mientras que un portavoz de la Jefatura Superior de la Policía ha asegurado que ha atacado "indiscriminadamente" a los que se ha encontrado. La actuación del hombre, con evidentes signos de trastorno mental y que ha confesado tranquilamente los hechos, no parece ser premeditada. El testigo mismo testigo ha precisado que nada más entrar ha sacado el arma y le ha pegado un hachazo a una mujer que se encontraba tras el mostrador de administración. La víctima ha caído al suelo, y el perturbado ha continuado atacando a una segunda mujer que estaba sentada, y que también ha quedado tendida en el suelo. Posteriormente, ha accedido al interior del habitáculo en el que estaba una tercera trabajadora y le ha asestado un golpe. Con las tres mujeres tendidas, ha continuado agrediéndolas.
Una de las enfermeras del centro de salud ha relatado a Efe que el agresor gritaba "os voy a matar, os voy a matar". "Una de mis compañeras ha logrado escapar gateando al lado del agresor, mientras éste atacaba a mis otras dos compañeras. Mi instinto ha sido salir corriendo a pedir ayuda, hacia una calle donde hay un descampado. Y allí me he quitado la bata, por si era una fijación de un loco por perseguir gente con bata", ha detallado María Ángeles.
Detenido por un joven
De las dos administrativas heridas, Pilar, de 55 años, ha sufrido la semiamputación de la mano derecha, amputación de falange izquierda y también levantamiento del cuero cabelludo. Está siendo atendida en La Paz, donde la operan para salvarle el miembro superior, y su estado es grave. Otra administrativa, también de nombre Pilar, de 51 años, ha perdido la primera falange del dedo índice de la mano derecha y tiene también levantamiento del cuero cabelludo. Ha sido trasladada al hospital de Fuenlabrada y, de ahí, la han derivado a la Fundación Jiménez Díaz de Madrid. Aunque en un principio su pronóstico era moderado, finalmente se encuentra en estado grave.
La tercera herida es una enfermera, Conchi, de 46 años, a la que se le ha arrancado parte del cuero cabelludo. También ha sido enviada en un primer momento al hospital de Fuenlabrada con pronóstico moderado, de donde ha sido traslada al Doce de Octubre de la capital, donde se encuentra en estado grave. Además, Emergencias de la Comunidad de Madrid ha atendido en el lugar a dos personas con crisis de ansiedad después de presenciar el suceso. Varios psicólogos atienden a las personas que se han visto involucradas en este suceso.
El ataque se ha producido sobre las 12.30. Tras irrumpir en el centro y atacar a los que se ha encontrado a su paso, el agresor ha salido del lugar a pie, todavía hacha en mano, y perseguido por un joven, Roberto, que se encontraba en el centro de salud con su mujer, Encarnación, a la espera de que un médico le atendiera a ella, que sufre un flemón.
Roberto lo ha retenido a 200 metros del ambulatorio, delante de un bar, hasta que ha llegado un vehículo de la Policía Local, que le ha arrestado y le ha conducido a los calabozos de la Comisaría de Policía Nacional. Tras prestar declaración, Roberto, muy nervioso por lo que había pasado, ha protagonizado un altercado con los policías. Según fuentes policiales, el agresor es vecino de Fuenlabrada y ha relatado a los agentes que "se encontraba en paro y tenía muchos problemas".
Según las declaraciones de varios testigos, antes de acudir al ambulatorio, situado en la calle Avilés número 2, el hombre había tenido un problema para concertar una cita médica, porque o bien se le anuló la cita o no se la querían conceder. Sin embargo, a los trabajadores del centro de salud no les consta que el hombre "tuviera ningún problema con ninguna cita previa", según han informado fuentes sanitarias, que han explicado que el agresor ha ido directamente a por las trabajadoras, sin motivo aparente.
El alcalde socialista de Fuenlabrada, Manuel Robles, y el consejero de Sanidad, Javier Fernández Lasquetty, han acudido al centro de salud y han lamentado y condenado el suceso. El consejero ha calificado de "increíble e inconcebible" que una persona se dirija a un centro de salud y hiera "de forma indiscriminada a la gente que se dedica a salvar vidas". Ha definido la situación como de "espanto y horror", pero sin embargo ha resaltado que este centro de salud "no era de los conflictivos".
El alcalde, por su parte, ha querido resaltar "la profesionalidad de la policía municipal" por la rapidez y eficacia con la que han detenido al agresor, y ha informado de que los psicólogos del Consistorio están atendiendo a los facultativos del centro. El ambulatorio permanece cerrado y así permanecerá probablemente el resto del día. Los pacientes están siendo derivados a otros ambulatorios cercanos, los de la calle Francia y la calle Teruel.

Itália: 6 muçulmanos presos por incitamento ao ódio

Isto é perseguição religiosa: eles estão apenas a cumprir os preceitos do islão: querem castigar os que colaboraram na apostasia de um muçulmano. Tudo normal, na perspectiva muçulmana. Incitam os muçulmanos a não se integrarem na sociedade italiana: tudo normal: o que os muçulmanos devem fazer não é transformar-se em muçulmanos ocidentais, mas sim transformar o Ocidente no islão ocidental.
Enfim: há que ler sobre o islão para perceber que estes homens não são extremistas, mas zelosos muçulmanos.

ROME (AP) - Italian police on Friday arrested six Moroccan men suspected of inciting hatred against Pope Benedict XVI for converting a Muslim journalist in Italy to Catholicism.

Stefano Fonsi, head of Brescia police's anti-terrorism squad in northern Italy, said the suspects allegedly banded together and met privately with the goal of stirring up religious hatred against non-Muslims, including the pope.

Investigators say they found literature exhorting Muslim immigrants against integrating into Italian society and saying the pope should be punished for having baptized the journalist during an Easter vigil ceremony in St. Peter's Basilica.

The investigation grew out of security checks ahead of a pastoral visit by Benedict to Brescia in 2009, but authorities insisted that their probe revealed no plot against the pontiff or other terrorism aims.

Brescia Prosecutor Fabio Salmone said there was "absolutely no" indication that the group had attacks in mind. "I rule that out," he told reporters. "There wasn't even a plan" to organize attacks, he said.

In 2008, Egyptian-born journalist Magdi Allam angered some Muslims by becoming a Catholic. After being baptized, he changed his name to Magdi Cristiano Allam. He had built a career in Italy as a newspaper commentator and author attacking Islamic extremism and supporting Israel.

See more at romancatholicblog.typepad.com
 

Alemanha: avança a xariá

Um tribunal alemão dá razão a um muçulmano trabalhador num supermercado que se recusou a arrumar garrafas de bebidas alcoólicas.
Assim vai avançando a xariá e o islão:

Amplify’d from www.bivouac-id.com

Un tribunal allemand vient de statuer que les employés musulmans de supermarchés ne sont pas obligés d’approvisionner le rayon alcool.

Un employé musulman d’un supermarché allemand avait été licencié après avoir refusé pour raisons religieuses de mettre des bouteilles d’alcool en rayon.  La plus haute cour de justice en droit du travail du pays a jugé que le refus de ce travailleur était fondée.

Ce n’est pas la première fois qu’un employé musulman se pourvoit en justice en Allemagne pour réclamer le droit de pratiquer sa religion au travail. Un certain nombre d’affaires ayant fait grand bruit ces dernières années impliquaient des musulmanes qui voulaient obtenir le droit de porter leur foulard au travail.

Mais cette affaire-ci est inhabituelle et sujette à controverses : la plus haute cour de justice allemande en droit du travail a statué qu’un employé musulman dans un supermarché peut refuser de manipuler de l’alcool pour des raisons religieuses.

L’affaire concerne un musulman employé dans un supermarché de Kiel, au nord de l’Allemagne. Il avait refusé de mettre en rayon des boissons alcoolisées en disant que sa religion lui interdisait d’entrer en contact avec l’alcool. Suite à cela, il avait été licencié en mars 2008.

Dans son jugement de jeudi, la cour fédérale du travail d’Allemagne a confirmé que les employés peuvent refuser certaines tâches pour des raisons religieuses. S’il existe une tâche alternative qu’ils peuvent accomplir qui soit compatible avec leur religion et utile à l’entreprise, alors l’employeur est obligé de leur permettre de la faire. L’entreprise ne peut licencier son employé que s’il n’existe pas d’alternative réaliste.

L’affaire de l’employé est désormais renvoyée à un tribunal de premier degré qui devra dire si le supermarché aurait pu confier à cet homme une tâche alternative à accomplir. Si c’est le cas, son licenciement deviendra caduc.

Cette affaire a déjà fait froncer des sourcils en Allemagne. Des analystes ont rappelé que le Coran interdit seulement la consommation d’alcool, et pas la manipulation de bouteilles. Un éditorial en première page de l’édition de vendredi du Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, le principal journal conservateur d’Allemagne, a fait remarquer que l’employé avait apparemment eu la révélation de ses penchants religieux en 2008, il avait en effet travaillé auparavant dans le rayon des alcools du supermarché sans s’en plaindre.

Source : Spiegel
Traduction Bivouac-ID, signalé par tnr

Schéma classique : l’adepte de la religion de tolérance™ refuse les règles du jeu, crée le problème, se pose en victime, et réclame qu’on joue selon les règles de l’islam. C’est la tactique des petits pas maintes fois dénoncée sur Bivouac-ID, on pousse le bouchon un peu plus loin à chaque fois, on voit si ça passe, et si ça ne passe pas, on temporise, on attaque ailleurs et on ressaie un peu plus tard. Les bonnes âmes s’étonneront ensuite que les entreprises aient quelque réticence à embaucher des individus revendiquant ostensiblement leur appartenance à la secte verdâtre. Et ce plus encore, lorsque des tribunaux irresponsables donnent raison à ces derniers.

Pour comprendre l’origine islamique du problème, voici quelques hadiths du prophète d’amour, de paix, et de tolérance™ :

Le Prophète a dit : Allah a maudit le vin, celui qui le boit, le sert, le vend, l’achète, le presse et celui pour qui il est pressé, celui qui le transporte et celui pour qui il est transporté. (récit de Abdullah ibn Umar, Dawud XXVI 3666)

Le Prophète a dit : Si des gens boivent du vin, fouettez-les, s’ils boivent encore, fouettez-les. S’ils boivent encore une fois, tuez-les. (récit de Mu’wiyah ibn Abu Sufyan, Dawud XXXVIII 4467)

Read more at www.bivouac-id.com
 

25.2.11

Turquia: mosteiro cristão milenar em risco

Quando ouvimos alguém defender a adesão da Turquia à UE, devemos perguntar-nos imediatamente a razão de tal posição. Ignorância? Maquiavelismo? Ingenuidade?

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

Zenit News, a Rome-based international Catholic news agency, reports on the latest example of Turkey sliding away from its secular constitution, back toward the intolerance that characterized the Ottoman Empire. No, the Turks aren’t kidnapping first-born boys to serve as janissaries… yet. Here’s what is happening:

Not even the Mongols of the 14th century, when they killed 40 monks and some 400 faithful, succeeded in making one of the most ancient Christian convents in the world disappear, but perhaps Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan of Turkey, can.
The convent in question belongs to a church that suffered Islamic conquest in the 8th century, the Syrian Orthodox, and the story of that church and this convent is a microcosm of Islamic intolerance in action. The convent of Mor Gabriel in the region of Turabdin, in southeastern Anatolia, was founded in 397. Zenit notes that Mor Gabriel isn’t just an ancient church; known to Syrian Christians as the "‘second Jerusalem,’ Mor Gabriel is in fact the See of the Metropolitan Mor Timotheus Samuel Aktas and the cultural and spiritual center of the dwindling Syro-Orthodox community of Turkey and of numerous Syriacs who've emigrated to the West. Just 50 years ago, some 130,000 Syriacs lived in the region of Turabdin… but today their number has decreased to just a few thousand.” Indeed, the once thriving monastic complex “today houses a small community of three monks and 14 sisters.”


Now the Islamic supremacists who are inexorably taking power in Turkey (thanks to democratic “reforms”) want to seize and liquidate what little is left of this ancient Christian community. Zenit cites a concerted campaign against Mor Gabriel “initiated in 2008 by the leaders of three Kurdish villages dominated by a tribe supported in Parliament by one of their leaders, Suleyman Celebi, who is a Parliamentarian with the pro-Islamic ruling party of Erdogan.” The Kurds are accusing the monks of:


  • Trying to convert Muslims to Christianity (so much for religious freedom in this aspiring EU member state), a charge the monks deny.

  • Residing on a site where a mosque once stood, “an unfounded and even absurd accusation, given that Mor Gabriel well precedes the birth of Islam.” Not that such considerations of logic or history ever cut much ice with Muslims before. The “history” in question is part of the jahiliyya, in any case, so what is the point of studying it?

  • Stealing Turkish public land to use for farming.
Read more at www.jihadwatch.org