Para os mujahideen, na jihad vale tudo

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

"Afghanistan: Eight-year-old girl 'used in attack'," from BBC News, June 26: An eight-year-old girl has been killed after insurgents used her in a bomb attack on police in southern Afghanistan, the government has said. The interior ministry said insurgents gave the girl a package and told her to take it to a police vehicle, detonating it as she approached. No-one else was killed in the explosion, in Uruzgan province. The incident came a day after an attack on a hospital which killed at least 38 people in the east of the country. Dozens were injured. Elderly people, pregnant women and children were said to be among the casualties. 'No respect' A statement by the ministry described the Uruzgan incident as a "crime and a shameful act". The area where the alleged incident happened is very remote, and it was not possible to independently verify the reports. "The child, pure-hearted and in good faith, took the bag and moved towards the police vehicle," it said. "As she got close to the police vehicle, the enemy detonated the bomb by remote control, killing the innocent child." The governor of Char Cheno district, where the attack took place, told the BBC the girl was from the nearest village. She was told nothing would happen to her, he said, adding that the perpetrators had "no boundary, no respect for anything". Correspondents say insurgents have recruited both adult women and recently male children to carry out suicide attacks, though the Taliban denies recruiting children. Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a161gd

«O Vaticano ajudou os judeus», afirma o embaixador israelita em Roma

Porque nunca é demais repeti-lo, contra a pseudo-sabedoria popular e supostamente intelectual: a Santa Sé e o Papa Pio XII ajudaram de diversos modos os judeus de Roma.
A asserção segundo a qual Pio XII é o «papa de Hitler» não tem fundamento e resultou de uma campanha levada a cabo por serviços secretos do Leste comunista, a qual encontrou solo fértil para se expandir no anti-catolicismo endémico das classes putativamente cultas do Ocidente.

Amplify’d from www.religionenlibertad.com

En el ámbito del reconocimiento «Justo entre las naciones» en memoria de don Gaetano Piccinini, el diplomático israelí, recordó el rol de la Iglesia en defensa de su pueblo

El embajador de Israel en la Santa Sede, Mordechay Lewy, al conferir el reconocimiento de “Justo entre las naciones” en memoria de don Gaetano Piccinini (1904-1972), religioso orionista de la congregación (Pequeña Obra de la Divina  Providencia) que se empeñó para salvar a muchos hechreos poniendo en riesgo su propia vida, declaró «sería un errore pensar que la ayuda a los hebreos durante la Guerra, en Roma, haya partido de conventos e institutos religiosos como si fuera una iniciativa sin el apoyo del Vaticano».

«Sería erróneo declarar que el Vaticano y el Papa se oponían a las acciones que favorecieron a los hebreos –declaró el embajador Lewy. La Santa Sede se empeñó. No pudo evitar que partiera el tren hacia Auschwitz el 18 de octubre de 1943. Seguramente los hebreos romanos esperaban en ese momento la protección del Papa, pero es un hecho que el del 18 de octubre fue el único convoy que salió hacia Auschwitz». Según el embajador  Lewy la «voluntad vaticana» por salvar a los hebreos es «un hecho».

Durante la ceremonia hablaron dos de las personas que ayudó don Piccinni: don Giuseppe Sorani en septiembre de 1943 era un muchacho hebreo de 15 años, que don Piccinini escondió y salvó; y Bruno Camerini, que se salvó con las hermanas y con la madre de don Piccinini, que recordaron cómo don respetaba siempre la fe hebraica. Don Flavio Peloso, superior general de los Orionistas, recordó cómo don Piccinini «concentraba en sí mismo toda una Protección civil de la caridad» y tras la guerra fue infatigable para socorrer a los pobres y a las víctimas italianas del terremoto de Irpina en 1962 y de la presa de Vajont en 1963 (Italia), y a las víctimas del terremoto en Belice de 1972. Read more at www.religionenlibertad.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a15tx9

Muçulmanos afegãos decapitam apósta, converso ao cristianismo

E isto com base no exemplo e na palavra do profeta Mafoma:

Ibn Abbaas said : The Messenger of Allah said, “Whoever changes his (Islamic) religion, kill him.” Al-Bukhary (number 6922)

Se não acreditais, lede:
http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/09/muhammad-whoever-changes-his-religion-kill-him.html

Amplify’d from www.religionenlibertad.com

La situación de los cristianos en Afganistán no fue excelente bajo la bota comunista de los rusos, pero no eran degollados, hoy con el presidente Hamid Karzai sostenido por las fuerzas internacionales de la OTAN, España entre ellas, los tribunales del estado afgano, no el aún más criminal de los talibanes, ha condenado a muerte a los musulmanes que han apostatado y se han convertido al cristianismo. Recientemente creyentes muy fervientes del Islam han gravado un video en el que se ve como decapitan a un cristiano en Afganistán en la provincia de Herat. Los fieles musulmanes capturan a un hombre de unos 40 años, llamado Abdul Latif, en las afueras de Enjeel, una ciudad al sur de Herat. En el video de dos minutos, los cuatro musulmanes llevan cinturones de explosivos y kefias para cubrir sus rostros y recitan versos del Corán mientras obligan a Abdul Latif a yacer en el suelo y le aplastan la cabeza, y uno de ellos dice en persa que “"Los que se unen con los paganos. . . su sentencia es ser decapitado” y "El que cambia de religión debe ser ejecutado" Recitan islámicamente pasajes del Corán: 8:12: …Infundiré el terror en los corazones de quienes no crean. Cortadles del cuello, pegadles en todos los dedos!" y los hadices de Muhammad. Los devotos musulmanes agarran el cuerpo del cristiano y uno de ellos le va seccionando el cuellos con una cuchillos, mientras la sangre fluye sobre la tierra, y los musulmanes entonan cánticos de alegrían y repiten Allahú Akhbar [Alá es el más grande], cuando la cabeza ha sido separada del cuerpo es depositada en la parte superior del pecho del cuerpo del cristiano. ¡¡ como gozan los devotos del Islam!! Ningún fiel de otra religión decapita o asesina en nombre de su religión, de su divinidad, ni en nombre de sus libros sagrados. Sólo hay una religión que permite a sus seguidores asesinar en su nombre. Ninguna más permite asesinar en su nombre a los que no creen en ella, o la abandonan. NOTAS http://www.worldmag.com/webextra/18252 http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=b42_1308852943 Read more at www.religionenlibertad.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a15tq8

«Risco de genocídio no Sudão»

Os muçulmanos no poder no Sudão não se conformam com o resultado do referendo realizado no sul do paísm no qual os seus cidadãos expressaram claramente a vontade de se livrar do jugo islâmico, com 98% de votos pela secessão. Os mujahideen reagiram, primeiro com incursões, mais recentemente com toda a força do seu poderio militar.
Isto não faz lembrar nada? Em 1999 um referendo num território maioritariamente cristão levou à reacção armada de milícias islâmicas apoiadas pelo estado do qual o território queria sair. O estado islâmico chama-se Indonésia e o estado secessionista Timor. Tratou-se, na realidade - embora ninguém nos media portugueses o tivesse percebido ou o quisesse dar a entender - de um episódio de jihad pela manutenção de um território islâmico no domínio da dar-al-islam. Na altura as pretensões dos mujahideen foram goradas. Como será agora no Sudão? E na Nigéria e na Costa do Marfim e na Somália e

Amplify’d from catholiclane.com

A Catholic bishop in Sudan has warned of a possible new genocide in the country. In an interview with Catholic charity Aid to the Church in Need (ACN), Bishop Macram Max Gassis of El Obeid Diocese warned of further problems in South Kordofan, on the border between north and south Sudan, where there has been fierce fighting since the beginning of June. He warned, “After Darfur, there is now a new impending genocide in Sudan.” Fighting in Sudan’s north-south border state of South Kordofan started on June 6, when the north Sudanese army attacked the state capital, Kadugli, carrying out airstrikes near there and Kauda. Among the targets were Christian churches and parish centers – one Protestant minister was killed.

Bishop Gassis, whose diocese covers the region, said, “Hundreds of thousands have now fled the area.”

Bishop Macram Gassis of El Obeid, Sudan

“The situation of the people in South Kordofan is extremely critical, especially in the capital, Kadugli.”

According to the United Nations, at least 60,000 people have fled the bombing in the region.

The bishop explained that the Nuba people, who are regarded by the north as second-class citizens, are among those hardest hit – both Muslims and Christians.

Observers in the area described the events as a targeted campaign and spoke of “ethnic cleansing.”

Many in the oil-rich Nuba Mountains in South Kordofan expressed the view that they should be part of the new country of South Sudan.

The south of Sudan voted by an overwhelming majority for independence from the north, and will officially become an independent nation on July 9, 2011.

During Sudan’s 1983-2005 civil war, the Nuba people fought on the side of the Sudanese People’s Liberation Army/Movement, which still controls the region.

While both the north Sudanese army and the SPLA entered into negotiations to cease hostilities on Thursday, June 16, after nearly two weeks of ongoing fighting, there are fears that conflict may continue.  One of the causes of the recent violence was an attempt by the north Sudanese army to disarm SPLA forces in the region, following a demand that troops be withdrawn. Just over a week before negotiations began, the SPLM’s Yasir Arman cautioned, “Disarming the SPLA north, if it continues, will bring a big crisis.”

Together with Abyei and Blue Nile, South Kordofan is one of three frontier regions between north and south whose status has still not been settled following January’s referendum.

The governor of South Kordofan, Ahmed Mohammad Haroun, is currently being sought by the international criminal court, on charges of war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur. Read more at catholiclane.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a15st0

“Primavera Árabe” – Expressão imprópria

Amplify’d from www.midiaamais.com.br

Primavera árabe? P rimavera Árabe [*] decolou como a descrição padrão da turbulência no Oriente Médio ao longo dos últimos cinco meses e meio; o Google apresenta 6,2 milhões de menções, enquanto “Revolta Árabe” aparece 660 mil vezes e “Sublevação Árabe”, meras 57 mil vezes. Eu nunca uso aquela primeira expressão, e por três razões:

1. É incorreta quanto à sazonalidade. Os distúrbios começaram na Tunísia em 17 de dezembro de 2010, bem no finzinho do outono, e os eventos principais aconteceram durante o inverno — a renúncia de Ben Ali em 14 de janeiro, a renúncia de Mubarak em 11 de fevereiro, o início dos distúrbios no Iêmen em 14 de fevereiro e na Líbia, em 15 de fevereiro. A primavera [hemisfério norte] praticamente acabou e nada de novo aconteceu nos últimos dois meses e meio. Assim, para ser exato, esses eventos deveriam ser chamados de “Inverno Árabe” (que recebe 88 mil menções no Google).

2.    Implica um otimismo sem garantia sobre as consequências. Enquanto eu noto o florescimento de um novo espírito construtivo na Praça Tahrir e em outros lugares, e avalio suas possibilidades em longo prazo, as implicações no curto prazo têm sido o empobrecimento e milhares de mortes, sem poder descartar a possibilidade de um avanço do radicalismo islamista.

3.    As demonstrações no Irã em 2011 não chegaram nem perto da magnitude daquelas de 2009, mas é inegável que tenham ocorrido no final de fevereiro e têm o potencial de inflamar — se isso acontecer, sua importância sobrepujará qualquer outra que estiver acontecendo na região. Logo, é um erro negligenciar o Irã [que não é árabe].

Portanto, e para mim, nada de “Primavera Árabe”. (Não vou nem mencionar que esta expressão faz com que eu imagine um oásis no deserto). Eu prefiro as expressões neutras e exatas tal como “Sublevações no Oriente Médio” (87 mil menções no Google).

Tradução: Henrique Dmyterko

Publicado em 31.05.2011. Também disponível no site do autor.

[*] NT: Quando os jornalistas da chamada grande mídia não sabem o que realmente está acontecendo, gostam de criar expressões ou rótulos que remetam a algum fato mais ou menos conhecido. Aqui, é óbvia a alusão à chamada “Primavera de Praga”, em 1968. Read more at www.midiaamais.com.br

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a15pmm

Mártires católicos da Revolução Francesa

Amplify’d from wdtprs.com

Today in the 2005 Martyrologium Romanum there is the following entry:

11*. Ad ancoram in salo ante portum Rupifortii in Gallia, beati Antonii Constantis Auriel, presbyteri et martyris, qui, vicarius paroecialis Cadurcensis, temporibus gallicae perturbationis propter sacerdotium in squalida navi inclusus, mox morbo correptus in concaptivis adiuvandis spiritum reddidit.

have you ever heard about the prison hulks?  The old ships used to incarcerate priests and religious during the French Revolution?

This episode in human history is an example of some of the very worst treatment of man by man.

The Martyrs of Rochefort were beatified by Pope John Paul II in 1995.

These blesseds are called the “les martyrs des pontons de Rochefort… martyrs of the ‘hulks’ of Rochefort” because, condemned to deportation, they were held in old ships used as prisons (pontons): the Washington, La Décade, La Vaillante, La Bayonnaise, Les Deux-Associés, and Bonhomme Richard.

827 priests and religious refused to swear the oath of the Civil Constitution of the Clergy of 12 July 1790, by which the Assembly attempted to reorganize the Church according to the model of the state.  By this instrument the state confiscated Church property and effectively forced clergy to commit a formal act of apostasy.

Of the 827 held in the “hulks” from 11 April 1794 to 7 February 1795, 542 died enduring horrific suffering for their faith, martyrs of the “Revolution”.  Some of the 285 survivors left written testimonies about the heroic examples of their martyred companions. Read more at wdtprs.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a15dcn

Daniel Greenfield: «Never again!»

Leia tudo!

Amplify’d from sultanknish.blogspot.com

Never again. To Jews it means a refusal to give genocidal bigots another go at them.

When the Jews who fought among the crumbling walls of the Warsaw Ghetto finally made it to Israel, they came just in time to load up their guns and fight once again for their people's survival. The survivors of one genocidal ideology bent on making someone pay for its sense of humiliation came just in time to fight off another version of the same thing. After 2000 years of running, an indigenous minority that had been kicked around by emperors and caliphs finally made its stand around a handful of farming towns and in alleyways lined by the golden stone of Jerusalem. Men and women who only a few years earlier hid in their homes from Muslim pogroms, covering their children's ears at the cries of "Ibtach Al Yahood", "Kill the Jews", took up arms. They stood alongside the settlers who had drained the swamps, the refugees fleeing Muslim terror in Egypt and Syria and the remains of the original indigenous Jewish population which had survived the conquests of seven empires. They stood and fought for their lives against an ideology that said they had no right to be free because of their religion and the blood in their veins. Like their Nazi allies, Muslim violence was driven by a need to reverse the humiliations of World War I which dismantled the Ottoman Empire and gave regional minorities like the Jews a chance at rebuilding their own independent countries. But going back to 1914 was only the beginning. Some wanted to go back to 1492 and the fall of Granada. Others in the Saudi desert were dreaming of a return to the 6th century. But what they all had in common was a refusal to tolerate an independent non-Muslim state in their midst. And even though Allied troops were still within sight of the rubble, ruined tanks and barbed wire camps remaining behind from the last time that their countries had chosen to appease this sort of thing with a slice of Czechoslovakia, they still chose appeasement. Again. President Wilson had idealistically envisioned turning over portions of the territories of the Ottoman Empire to peoples like the Jews and Armenians who had struggled for so long under Muslim dominion. But the European willingness to tolerate and appease Muslim violence nearly put an end to both dreams. Turkish armies swarmed over Armenia at the first opportunity and Arab armies did the same in Israel. The lesson was the same. If you wanted to be free to practice your religion, to live under your own laws, not those of the Koran which dictate the inferiority of minorities, you had to stand up and fight for it without counting on the support of the West. Wilsonian idealism was no match for British imperialism, and that was no match for Postmodern globalism. Both British and Globalist empire building desired stability at all costs. President Wilson had wanted to give the peoples oppressed by Islam a chance to breathe the fresh air of freedom. But the British Empire turned over the largest part of Israel to a Saudi monarchy to rule over as the newly created nation of Jordan. Then the UN partitioned the remainder into a stump with indefensible borders in an attempt to appease the gathering Muslim armies. But the armies of Islam rejected even that partition and chose war instead. Now Barack Hussein Obama and a coterie of European leaders would like Israel to go back to those indefensible borders. Not because it will bring peace, but for the same reason that he retasked NASA from studying stars, to pander to the genocidal fragility of Muslim self-esteem.

The West has sold out Israel, the way that it once sold out Czechoslovakia, and with the same results. Muslims are no more satiated with the prospect of an ethnically cleansed Palestine, than Nazi Germany was with a Volksdeutsche Sudetenland. Their vision of a "Pure Arab-Muslim Palestine" inevitably swallows Israel, as it already does on their maps, and then aspires to join with a Pan-Islamic state stretching from Cairo to Damascus and beyond.

Just as the Sudetenland was only the first bite out of Czechoslovakia, then Eastern Europe and then Europe... and then the world. So too Palestine is the first bite, followed by the overthrow of secular regimes in Egypt, Algeria and Turkey, the conquest of multi-religious African states, like Nigeria and Cote d'Ivoire, and then Drang Nach Osten, into Europe, and finally civil war in Thailand, India and China. This is what World War III looks like. And it is happening before our very eyes.

Never Again has become an empty phrase. Something that angry world leaders shout when the victims aren't eager enough to appease the Third Reich or the Seventh Caliphate. Leaders who are committed to the false narrative that the violence in the Middle-East is caused by insufficient territorial concessions by the region's only Non-Muslim minority to its Sunni Muslim majority, rather than the unwillingness of the Sunni Muslim majority to practice tolerance in their own countries, throughout the region or the world. Jews cannot allow Never Again to become an empty catchphrase or a universalized call for tolerance that fails to hold Islam accountable for its promotion of bigotry, violence and genocide. While Jewish leaders occupy themselves with empty calls for interfaith brotherhood, Jewish farms and villages once again fall under siege. Farmers sleep with guns by their beds, children are taught to race to bomb shelters and Jewish store windows are smashed in the cities of Europe. Armies of soldiers, terrorists and diplomats gather once again to carve up Jerusalem. To ethnically cleanse half the city of Jews and turn it into a platform for terror.

This is what going back to 1948 means. It means going back to a religious civil war and a stump state with indefensible borders. This is the vision of international diplomats who hope that feeding a big enough piece of Israel to the crocodile will put it to sleep. It is also the vision of a leftist elite in Israel which wants to turn the Gush Dan region into a cramped tech-happy Singapore, and let Jerusalem and the farmlands fall into enemy hands, in the hope that they will be left alone to sip coffee in their cafes and launch their IPO's in peace. But it is nothing more than the Warsaw Ghetto with an internet cafe. And even they are only a few years away from discovering that. Shimon Peres' vision of Tel Aviv as the Warsaw Ghetto with an internet cafe and a nanotech research lab, is colliding with the Muslim vision of the fall of Israel as the first of many victories over the Kufar, and the vision of world leaders of Israel dissolving away to make room for a Muslim Middle-East. Only one of those visions can survive or none of them. Either Israel falls to the first wave of a Jihad that will engulf the world, or it once again makes a stand.

The Europeans and Obama competing to offer Israel the best 'alternative' before the UN recognizes Palestine is nothing but empty theater. There is no compromise that will settle the issue. Nor can Israel ever convince the world compromisers of that. So long as the world community accepts the inevitability of Islamic dominance, then Israel will always be the goat. The sacrifice to appease the beast. If Never Again means anything at all, it is a refusal to be the sacrifice, to be placed on the altar of appeasement for a Holocaust, a burnt offering, to the Moloch of insatiable rage and genocidal fanaticism. Jews say, "Never Again" for the same reason that rape victims say, "No, Means No." We have been there. We are not going to allow it to happen again. No matter what words are used to justify it. No matter how the perpetrators turn the world around so that they are right and we are wrong, so that their violence is just and our self-defense isn't. No matter how many ways they find to blame us for their actions. World leaders may try to carve us up, but we will never consent to it. Not orally and not silently. We will resist. We have said Never Again so many times that we have forgotten what the words mean. They have lost their edge. Worse, they have lost their purpose. It's time to stop just saying , "Never Again". It's time to mean it. Read more at sultanknish.blogspot.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a158gk

Primavera degenera em Inferno para os cristãos egípcios

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

Tolerant New Egypt: "When they were beating me, they kept saying: 'We won't leave any Christians in this country'"

It is a politically correct article of faith that there is nothing inherently abusive in Sharia law that cannot be written off as tribal or cultural baggage, or as a prescription so old (14 centuries ago, after all!) that it is assumed no longer to be relevant even to sincere believers -- at least not to that Vast Majority of Moderates. Qur'an 9:29? Nah. Dhimmitude is so last-millennium.

The subsequent assumption is that since Islam is supposed to be peaceful and tolerant, an increased role for Islam in society can only be good for peace and tolerance in a way that would just happen to match Western standards and expectations for those concepts.

And so people are surprised when things like this happen, and that they keep happening. "As Islamists Flex Muscle, Egypt's Christians Despair," by Yaroslav Trofimov for the Wall Street Journal via AINA, June 12:

QENA, Egypt—Five weeks after the fall of the Egyptian regime, Ayman Anwar Mitri's apartment was torched. When he showed up to investigate, he was bundled inside by bearded Islamists.

Mr. Mitri is a member of the Christian Coptic minority that accounts for one-tenth of the country's 83 million people. The Islamists accused him of having rented the apartment—by then unoccupied—to loose Muslim women.

Inside the burnt apartment, they beat him with the charred remains of his furniture. Then, one of them produced a box cutter and performed what he considered an appropriate punishment under Islam: He amputated Mr. Mitri's right ear.

That could be read as an allusion and possible prelude to amputations more explicitly prescribed in Islamic law, such as Qur'an 5:33's call to amputate the hand and foot on opposite sides from those who "spread mischief in the land."

"When they were beating me, they kept saying: 'We won't leave any Christians in this country,'" Mr. Mitri recalled in a recent interview, two months after the March attack. Blood dripped through a plastic tube from his unhealed wound to a plastic container. "Here, there is a war against the Copts," he said.

His attackers, who were never arrested or prosecuted, follow the ultrafundamentalist Salafi strain of Islam that promotes an austere, Saudi-inspired worldview. Before President Hosni Mubarak was toppled on Feb. 11, the Salafis mostly confined themselves to preaching. Since then, they've entered the political arena, drawing crowds and swaying government decisions. Salafi militants also have blocked roads, burned churches and killed Copts.

The Salafi vigilantes who brutalized Mr. Mitri later ignited a bigger controversy that is still playing out here in Qena, an upper Nile governorate of three million people—almost one-third of them Copts. In April, Egypt's new government appointed a Christian to be Qena's new governor, replacing another Christian who had held the post under Mr. Mubarak. The Salafis responded by demanding a Muslim governor and organizing mass protests, showcasing the movement's new political influence.

The crisis in Qena, still not fully resolved, raises questions about what kind of Egypt will emerge from the post-revolutionary chaos—and whether its revolution will adhere to the ideals of democracy and equality that inspired it. The country's military rulers and liberal forces may ultimately succeed at containing religious strife and limiting the Islamists' political power....

There is more. Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a1505d

Agradar aos muçulmanos é o principal vector da política externa norte-americana

Leia tudo.
Entre outras coisas, ficará a saber o que é The Blowback Theory e The Infinite Muslim Terrorists Theory, teorias que explicam porque é que os muçulmanos matam os infiéis e porque é que não nos devemos defender.
Brilhante como sempre, Daniel Greefield!

Amplify’d from sultanknish.blogspot.com

In France, American embassies and consulates have been directed to "empower" Muslim and push for the passage of "social reforms" that will benefit them. In the UK, American diplomats were directed to again "empower" Muslims and made outreach to them a top priority. In Israel, the US consulate in Jerusalem caters only to Muslims and does its best to pretend that Jews and Israel don't even exist. And when Obama visited Greece, what else did he do but push the political and religious authorities to open more mosques and Islamic schools. America's own interests and our obligations to our allies have been put aside to focus on a single goal of overriding importance. Pandering to the Muslim world. It's as if we have no other foreign policy goal anymore beyond keeping Muslims happy.

The United States has its first Special Representative to Muslim Communities in the person of Farah Pandith. We also have Rashad Hussain, a Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference. (No relation to Barack Hussein Obama. The name Hussain is common among Muslims as a tribute to Mohammed's grandson, Hussain ibn Ali, the 'Martyr Of Martyrs' in Islam.) Hussain (Rashad, not Barack) had ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, which helped create both Al Qaeda and Hamas, and defended Islamic Jihad leader Sami Al-Arian. Farah Pandith is a Kashmiri Muslim who began her career as Barbara Bush's secretary. But just creating two new Muslim posts in the diplomatic sector isn't enough.

NASA Administrator Bolden told Al Jazeera that the agency's new priority is outreach to Muslims. After gutting NASA and killing its space program, the agency focused on its new top priority by appointing Waleed Abdalati, as its new Chief Scientist. Waleed Abdalati is a twofer, as a Muslim and a Global Warming researcher. So the Obama Administration gets to kill off the space program and replace it with Global Warming junk science headed by a Muslim. It's what the devil would call synergy.

Is any of this working? Does the Muslim world love us now? No they don't. And France, the UK, Israel and Greece like us less for tampering with their internal affairs at Muslim instigation. All the outreach in the world can't help, because it's not outreach, it's pandering. Not only is it condescending, but it sends a message of weakness and desperation. When we pressure our allies on behalf of Muslims, we're sending them a signal that our first priority is fulfilling the marching orders we received from the Muslim world. And this not only fragments our traditional alliances, but it encourages Muslim regimes to support further acts of terrorism to improve their position.

This frantic flurry of outreach reveals that we consider Islam to be the primary threat to global stability and a major national security threat. The positive image reveals the negative. We're so obsessed with pandering to Muslims because we're afraid of them. The Muslim world knows it, and gloats, when it isn't busy acting offended. The American public knows it too, even behind the camouflage tarp of learning about other cultures, that we're trying to defuse the violence. But trying to defuse violence through appeasement is not a good strategy unless you're willing to go all the way to Dhimmitown.

By enslaving our foreign policy to Islamic interests, we're already much of the way there. Chief Justice Stephen Breyer has adopted a new Constitutional understanding of free speech, in which you're free to say what you want as long as it doesn't run the risk of getting Muslims violently angry. In Europe you can be arrested for yodeling even in the shadow of the Alps-- if it offends a Muslim. A 21st century revival of The Sound of Music might now feature the Von Trapp family escaping into the mountains only to end up under arrest because some immigrant from Algeria, Morocco or Turkey was offended because the sound of "The Lonely Goatherd" resembled his own prayers to Allah a little too much.

What does this have to do with foreign policy? Everything. If we treat the Muslims of the world as a collective group always balanced on the edge of exploding, then there is no more difference between foreign and domestic policy when it comes to Muslims. Accordingly every Western country with a Muslim minority must pursue only Muslim approved policies at home and abroad. If Thailand, Israel or India begin fighting Muslim terrorism-- they must join in on the Muslim side. If France passes a Burqa ban, then the United States must begin lobbying to overturn it. If Danish cartoons in a local newspaper offend Muslims, then the Prime Minister of Denmark must be compelled to apologize for his country's free speech before being allowed to become NATO's Secretary General.

The combination of Muslim terrorism and immigration eradicates all differences between foreign and domestic policies. There is only one policy. A Muslim policy. And the bottom line of the Muslim policy is that Muslims get what they want. At any cost. Any price. Freedom, morality, loyalty, national values and human rights are dispensable now. Appeasing Muslims is not.

Appeasing Muslims had tied the free world in an infernal knot. Each country pressures its own citizens and other countries to do whatever Muslims want. This would be unjustifiable even if it worked, but the damnedest thing of all, is that it doesn't actually discourage Muslim violence. It actually encourages it. And why not? If countries pandered to murderers, rapists and robbers instead of putting them in prison-- would there be less murders, rapes and robberies. Or would there be more?

The only way we can justify our craven appeasement is through the belief in the discredited Blowback Theory of Muslim violence. The Blowback Theory holds that Muslim violence is only retaliatory. That every time Muslims kill people, it's only because they're retaliating for a wrong done to them. Whether that wrong be a Predator drone taking out a terrorist (who was only retaliating for being yodeled at), drawing a cartoon of an illiterate 7th century pedophile worshiped by a billion people with deficient morals, or some battle fought 600 years ago. Whatever it may be-- the Blowback Theory holds that Muslims are always in the right to kill us. And we're always in the wrong to defend ourselves against being killed.

The corollary to the Blowback Theory is the Infinite Muslim Terrorists Theory. The Infinite Muslim Terrorists Theory holds that every Muslim grievance creates new terrorists. Like an angel getting its wings every time a bell rings, the Infinite Muslim Terrorists Theory warns us that every time we offend Muslims, it bring forth new terrorists. And shooting them does no good. Because shooting terrorists only offends Muslims even more. And that generates still more terrorists. Kill a terrorist and four more take his place. And if the process keeps going, there will eventually be more Muslim terrorists in the world than there are Muslims, causing the entire world to implode into the event horizon of a singularity.

The paradox of the Infinite Muslim Terrorists Theory is that it insists that the vast majority of Muslims is peaceful, and yet threatens that every single one of those peaceful people can be converted into homicidal maniacs if we're not careful. And when combined with Blowback Theory, it puts the blame for the instant terrorist conversion on us. Like Gremlins that we're afraid of feeding after midnight, we take care to step lightly around Muslims, for fear that they will suddenly turn into monsters bent on killing us. Such thinking might be considered bigoted, but with Blowback Theory we know that if they do turn into homicidal monsters, it will be entirely 100 percent our fault.

And for all the cringing and crawling, appeasing and advocating, the violence continues to grow. Because you can end violence by taking a firm stand, not by falling to your knees. Read more at sultanknish.blogspot.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a14xup

Bioideologias

Amplify’d from www.zenit.org

ZENIT: O senhor fala em seu livro sobre “bioideologias”. Poderia nos explicar em que consistem e suas consequências para a pessoa humana?

Roberto Esteban Duque: As bioideologias são moralismos que buscam o poder para fazer com outros homens o que lhes compraz. O adversário é a religião tradicional, que pressupõe a existência de uma natureza humana comum, fixa e universal; daí a necessidade de substituir tal religião pela educação. A isso aponta a lei de 2007 de Educação para a Cidadania, aprovada na Espanha. Interessa-lhes mais a modificação da consciência através da cultura que a mudança das estruturas. São aparentemente resíduos das ideologias, mas se diferenciam delas porque sustentam a inexistência de uma natureza humana ou, pelo menos, sua completa modelabilidade,, tanto no humano quanto no natural. Aqui já se pode advertir uma contradição: enquanto a natureza humana não é algo evidente para a opinião pública, exige-se uma quantidade imensa de direitos, apoiando-se nos direitos humanos.

O que as bioideologias apresentam é a construção a la carte da identidade humana. Aqui reside seu êxito. O homem é produto da evolução, muda segundo as circunstâncias e é possível fazê-lo evoluir no sentido desejado. Seus meios preferidos são a reivindicação de direitos, a engenharia educativa e a propaganda, apoiados pela engenharia médica e genética. As bioideologias adotam o papel do vitimismo, a “cultura da reclamação”, muito útil para a propaganda, sendo a discriminação um dos seus conceitos centrais. O ódio e o ressentimento são seus sentimentos básicos, ainda que contem também com seus fins lucrativos.

Outro denominador comum é a eugenesia, que assemelha a natureza humana à natureza animal. Daqui se chega a solicitar a morte por motivos humanitários: aborto, eutanásia, contracepção artificial. Da mesma forma, reivindica-se o “direito” à autodeterminação de quem se considera diferente, acentuando o igualitarismo até limites insuspeitados, como negar as diferenças naturais e biológicas (heterossexuais e homossexuais, idades naturais), exaltando o desvio natural e o patológico, como a homossexualidade e a pedofilia. Seu último fundamento é o emocional: os desejos e os caprichos, produto da moral hedonista. Nega-se a vida natural (desconstrução da natureza humana histórica) e se pretende, a partir de um notável sectarismo, que se aceitem seus preconceitos como verdades irrefutáveis, assumindo um caráter individualista em sua pretensão de libertar o homem das suas ataduras naturais e físicas.

As consequências para a pessoa, como podemos perceber, são múltiplas. Socavam o consenso social e o ethos, levando à ditadura do relativismo e à indiferença, exaltando o igualitarismo, ainda que discriminado aos que não são do grupo. Acreditam que se podem alterar não somente as leis humanas positivas - como as que regem o casamento e a família -, mas as próprias leis da natureza - como a diferença de sexos e as leis que regem a mudança climática. São formas da contracultura, reações intelectuais astênicas contra as normas culturais. Devem sua força à persistência do modo de pensamento ideológico que impregna a cultura dos meios de comunicação, intelectuais e políticos. Apelam à ciência para justificar seus desejos. São meros grupos de pressão que agem na mídia e na cultura, sendo parte do suculento negócio da contracultura. Se não existe uma natureza humana, tudo depende finalmente da vontade de poder.

O ecologismo, a homossexualidade e o feminismo são algumas conhecidas bioideologias. Mas seria bom notar que as bioideologias da saúde atemorizam as pessoas, estendendo o conceito de doença ao que impede a satisfação do desejo. Consideram a gravidez como um mal – daí a distribuição gratuita de anticoncepcionais e a defesa do aborto -, mas consideram a impossibilidade de satisfazer o desejo de ter filhos como equivalente a uma doença e, portanto, esse desejo deve ser satisfeito como problema público, como o caso da reprodução assistida artificial. A demagogia compassiva dos governos intervencionistas, apoiando-se no humanitarismo, faz sua esta bioideologia, justificando o genocídio do aborto e da eutanásia.

ZENIT: O senhor acusa duramente todos os feminismos. Não há matizes? De fato, na década de 20 e 30, na Espanha, houve feminismos católicos. Não é verdade que, graças à ação em prol dos direitos de muitas mulheres, hoje a família é mais uma comunidade na qual todos contam, do que uma instituição patriarcal na qual a mulher casada seria considerada menor de idade e precisaria da autorização do marido para uma série de decisões de cunho legal ou profissional?

Roberto Esteban Duque: Você acha que sou duro? Eu só me limito a constatar que a Espanha está encabeçando políticas feministas radicais. Que outra coisa seria a “ideologia de gênero”? As políticas do atual governo da Espanha são paradigmáticas quando às reivindicações feministas na relativização dos papéis sexuais, como o casamento homossexual, a impregnação “de gênero” da educação, como a Educação para a Cidadania, e o favorecimento da promiscuidade sexual, com a distribuição da pílula abortiva.

Naturalmente, existiu um feminismo compatível com o catolicismo, um feminismo clássico, que se limita a estender o princípio da igualdade do sexo feminino perante a lei. Mas logo depois, nos anos 60, politizou-se o âmbito familiar: as fontes de opressão sexual já não são as leis discriminatórias, mas a função de mãe e esposa. A deriva do feminismo rumo à liberdade sexual e a cultura da morte, a anticoncepção e o aborto livre serão seus sinais mais característicos.

O que acontece desde os anos 90? Simples: substitui-se o conceito de sexo (determinação biológica) pelo de gênero (construção cultural), acudindo à demagogia do aprofundamento da democracia e a extensão ou ampliação de direitos, com o fim de politizar o âmbito familiar. São estas as propostas progressistas de que uma nação precisa? Realmente os católicos podem se permitir o luxo de permanecer de braços cruzados e não opor resistência ao que poderíamos chamar de “hegemonia cultural progressista”?

Roberto Esteban Duque nasceu em Mira (Espanha), em 1963. Foi ordenado pelo bispo José Guerra Campos, em 1991. Cursou teologia na Universidade São Vicente Ferrer de Valência, com especialização em matrimônio e família pela Universidade Pontifícia Lateranense de Roma. É doutor em teologia moral pela faculdade de São Dâmaso de Madri. Read more at www.zenit.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a14wxz

Britânico arrisca pena de 2 anos por meter bacon nos sapatos de muçulmanos

Destaque de um artigo a ler na íntegra:
«Western countries have learned to harshly punish those who offend Muslims, not because of the crime itself, but its potential to set off a murderous response by the Muslims themselves. For all that the politicians pretend that they're cracking down on those who make the poor Muslim dears feel unwelcome in Albion, Columbia or Marianne, in the name of human rights, it's the explosive reaction that they're worried about»

e, para finalizar:

«But it is vital that we remember what is really important here. Ham and shoes. And anything that offends Muslims. It is vital that we forget the terror, the massacres, murders, rapes and honor killings. It is vital that we pay no attention to the fact that nearly every rape in Oslo in the past five years was perpetrated by the Religion of Sex Slaves. Ignore the Muslim university speakers preaching that there is a permanent state of war between Islam and the rest of the world. It's a thin line between thinking forbidden thoughts and doing forbidden things. If you concede reality, then you might as well be a ham shoe stuffer yourself.»

Amplify’d from sultanknish.blogspot.com

The UK Home Secretary has warned about complacency in the face of Islamic extremism. But there are no worries about complacency when it comes to things that irritate Muslims. As a drunken fellow from Bristol found out when decided it would be funny to stuff pieces of ham into the shoes of mosquegoers. Twenty years ago this might have made for an amusing limerick. Today it's a possible two year jail term.

"It is difficult to imagine a more offensive incident", said Her Honour Judge Carol Hagen. Her Honour clearly lacks imagination. But even if she can't imagine a pig with a burning koran in its mouth being catapulted in the direction of Mecca, there is the teacher who was savagely beaten by Muslim thugs for the crime of teaching Muslim girls. Smashing in a man's face seems worse than some ham in a shoe. The prosecutor harrumphed that pork products in shoes were a "premeditated attack specifically targeted at the Muslim community". As premeditated attacks go, this has more in common with Dr. Seuss, than with the sort of attacks that the Muslim community specializes in. When the Muslim community launches a premeditated attack, there's burning rubble and body parts that have to be scraped up off the sidewalk. The only thing that had to be scraped off this time around was stale pork. Not to be left behind in the misplaced outrage sweepstakes, the ham stuffer's attorney called it, "a brutal, misconceived, drunken prank." It was doubtlessly drunken, but how brutal was it? On a scale of silly to brutal, putting pork in shoes ranks somewhere below a water bucket over the door and above a joy buzzer. But when even your own lawyer describes something that has more in common with a Dada art exhibit, than the savage beating of a teacher, as brutal, then there isn't anyone left to make the case for you. Read more at sultanknish.blogspot.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a14uhj

Ex-parlamentar kuwaitiana defende esclavagismo sexual

Prática, aliás, perfeitamente respaldada pelo Alcorão e pelo exemplo do profeta Mafoma.

Amplify’d from www.minutodigital.com

Salwa al Mutairi, una presentadora de televisión y activista política kuwaití, propone legalizar la esclavitud sexual como solución para combatir el adulterio. Según ella, la solución pasaría por ‘liberar’ a mujeres no musulmanas atrapadas en guerras de otros países y reciclarlas como concubinas al servicio de hombres de su país.

Para ilustrar su punto de vista, la activista kuwaití pone como ejemplo a Harún al-Rashid, califa de la dinastía abasí que gobernó en el siglo VIII y que, al parecer, contaba con 2.000 concubinas.

La mujer recomendó que la trata de blancas se realice por medio de agencias especializadas como las que gestionan la contratación de criadas, y sugirió que la edad mínima de las esclavas sea de 15 años.

Mutairi dice contar con el respaldo de algunos sabios religiosos de Arabia Saudí y Kuwait, uno de los cuales presuntamente relacionó la idea de las prisioneras de guerra con la conquista de una nación no musulmana por un país musulmán.

Los comentarios de Mutairi que han aparecido en Internet y en medios del Golfo Pérsico han causado indignación entre los internautas de muchos países.

A uno de ellos, Mona Eltahawy, le gustararía saber “si le habría gustado a Salwa al Mutairi haber sido vendida como botín durante la ocupación de Kuwait por Irak” durante la Guerra del Golfo de 1990–1991, informó el diario británico The Daily Mail. Read more at www.minutodigital.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a14uds

Jihad e Esclavagismo, realidades vivas do islão

Vivas porque se encontram no Alcorão e na tradição do profeta do islão, logo são normativas para os muçulmanos ad aeternum.

Amplify’d from www.meforum.org

Raped and Ransacked in the Muslim World by Raymond Ibrahim FrontPageMagazine.com May 31, 2011 http://www.meforum.org/2920/raped-and-ransacked-in-the-muslim-world

Plundering the possessions, lives, and dignity of Christians in the Islamic world: is this a random affair, a product of the West's favorite offenders—poverty, ignorance, grievance—or is it systematic, complete with ideological backing?

Consider the very latest from the Muslim world:

Pakistan: Muslim landowners used tractors to plough over a Christian cemetery in order to seize the land illegally. A young Christian mother was raped by six men. "In both cases, police covered up for the culprits." Iraq: A Christian youth was kidnapped and decapitated: his family could not pay the €70,000 ransom demanded by his abductors. "The murder was meant to intimidate Christians so that in the future they will more readily pay ransom demands." Egypt: Christian girls continue to be abducted and forced into conversion or concubinage (which amount to the same thing) and "kept as virtual slaves."

None of this is surprising listening to popular Muslim preacher Abu Ishaq al-Huwaini:

If only we can conduct a jihadist invasion at least once a year or if possible twice or three times, then many people on earth would become Muslims. And if anyone prevents our dawa or stands in our way, then we must kill them or take as hostage and confiscate their wealth, women and children. Such battles will fill the pockets of the Mujahid who can return home with 3 or 4 slaves, 3 or 4 women and 3 or 4 children. This can be a profitable business if you multiply each head by 300 or 400 dirham. This can be like financial shelter whereby a jihadist, in time of financial need, can always sell one of these heads (meaning slavery) [translated by Nonie Darwish; original Arabic recording here].

Huwaini actually made these scandalous assertions some eighteen years ago. But because they were only recently exposed, he was invited to "clarify" his position on Hikma TV last week. Amazingly, though he began by saying his words were "taken out of context," he nonetheless reasserted, in even more blunt language, that Islam justifies plundering, enslaving, and raping the infidel. (Al Youm 7 has the entire interview, excerpts of which I translate below.)

Huwaini: "When I want a sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her"

According to Huwaini, after Muslims invade and conquer a non-Muslim nation—in the course of waging an offensive jihad—the properties and persons of those infidels who refuse to convert or pay jizya and live as subjugated dhimmis, are to be seized as ghanima or "spoils of war."

Huwaini cited the Koran as his authority—boasting that it has an entire chapter named "spoils"—and the sunna of Muhammad, specifically as recorded in the famous Sahih Muslim hadith wherein the prophet ordered the Muslim armies to offer non-Muslims three choices: conversion, subjugation, or death/enslavement.

Huwaini said that infidel captives, the "spoils of war," are to be distributed among the Muslim combatants (i.e., jihadists) and taken to "the slave market, where slave-girls and concubines are sold." He referred to these latter by their dehumanizing name in the Koran, ma malakat aymanukum—"what your right hands possess"—in this context, sex-slaves: "You go to the market and buy her, and she becomes like your legal mate—though without a contract, a guardian, or any of that stuff—and this is agreed upon by the ulema."

"In other words," Huwaini concluded, "when I want a sex-slave, I go to the market and pick whichever female I desire and buy her."

Lest Muslims begin attacking all and sundry, however, Huwaini was careful to stress that Islam forbids Muslims from plundering and enslaving nominal or even "heretical" Muslims, such as Shias. He used the Iran-Iraq war as an example, saying that a Sunni man is not permitted to enslave and abuse a Shia woman, "for she is still a Muslim and thus considered free."

Unfortunately Huwaini's position is not "radical." One is reminded of when Sheikh Gamal Qutb was asked on live TV if Islam permits men to rape their female captives. The one-time grand mufti of Islam's most authoritative university, Al Azhar—the institution that once gave us the "adult breast-feeding" fatwa—refused to answer and, when pressed, became hostile and stormed off the set.

Let us now return to the atrocities that opened this article and ask: In light of the above, is it any wonder that Christians under Islam are routinely raped and ransacked, even as the "humanitarian" West yawns?

Raymond Ibrahim is associate director of the Middle East Forum Read more at www.meforum.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a148be