O Pe. Botros, Flagelo do Islão, está de volta

É árabe e cristão. Lê o Alcorão e discute-o com quem tem coragem de o fazer. Fala aos corações e às mentes e às almas dos muçulmanos. É considerado instrumento de milhões de conversões de muçulmanos a Cristo. Por isso, é o Inimigo nº 1 do islão e sob ele pende uma fatwa que promete 60.000.000 de dólares a quem o matar.
É o Padre Zakaria Botros. Que Deus o assista!

Amplify’d from www.raymondibrahim.com

Zakaria Botros: Islam's Scourge Returns by Raymond Ibrahim FrontPageMagazine.com July 8, 2011 http://www.raymondibrahim.com/9873/zakaria-botros-islam-scourge-returns

Father Zakaria Botros, also known as Islam's "Public Enemy #1," is back.

Scourge of Islam; Lover of Muslims

From around 2005-2010, this 76 year-old Coptic priest was Islam's bane. Appearing weekly on Arabic satellite, where he was viewed by an estimated 60 million people worldwide, mostly Muslims, he meticulously exposed any number of theological problems with Islam—all from Islam's own books—while simultaneously evangelizing from his own book, the Bible.

His mission "is to attack Islam, not to attack Muslims but to save them because they are deceived. As I love Muslims, I hate Islam."

And he has been effective: Mass conversions to Christianity, open and clandestine, have resulted. Indeed, years back al-Jazeera aired a segment complaining about Fr. Zakaria's "unprecedented evangelical raid" on the Muslim world; similarly, one Sheikh Ahmad al-Qatani lamented that as many as six million Muslims annually "apostatize" to Christianity.

Unsurprisingly, Fr. Zakaria's exploits caused al-Qaeda to proclaim him "one of the most wanted infidels in the world," putting a $60 million bounty on his head; undeterred, the priest kept going, his viewers and converts multiplying by the week.

Then, in May 2010, after a particularly graphic episode on Muhammad, his shows inexplicably stopped airing. His enemies exulted. Muslim leaders, preachers, and sheikhs appeared on TV, gleefully announcing that Allah had silenced the great enemy of Islam.

Yet, over a year after his many foes—external and internal, Muslim and non-Muslim—have managed to stifle him, Fr. Zakaria is back on satellite, now with his own station Fady TV (Redeemer TV), "a channel for those searching for the truth."

Though other Islam-critics and evangelists have appeared on Arabic satellite since, many with a good following, it is clear that people have not forgotten the priest, the original trailblazer of open and honest talk on Islam—the original scourge of Islam.

Watching the first episode of his new show, "Knowledge of the Truth," was like witnessing a reunion between a lost flock and its spiritual shepherd. Viewer after viewer—Christians and Muslims, much more of the latter—called in to express how much they had sorely missed the evangelist, and how happy they were to see him again, some in tears, others in joyous laughter.

And while their words were full of sincere and enthusiastic praise—many insisted that he is a living saint, others a modern day St. Paul—it was only when an elderly-sounding woman asserted that everyone must support Fr. Zakaria, not for his sake, but for the sake of his work liberating Muslims from bondage, that the normally stoic Zakaria broke down in tears.

Why is Fr. Zakaria so loved—and hated? For starters, as a native Arabic-speaker, he takes his message straight to the heart of the Islamic world; as a man of God, he takes his message straight to the heart of Muslims—something the Western approach cannot achieve.

You see, while Western critics are limited to making secular arguments against specific aspects of Islam—for instance, that it is illiberal, intolerant, sexist—he makes spiritual arguments against the very foundations of the religion.

This is not to say that Western polemics are not beneficial; they are, in that they awaken Western peoples to the nature of Islam. However, arguing or even proving that Islam falls short of Western/secular standards has little impact on Muslims—except perhaps to make them more tenacious of their faith (the inevitable result of comparing apples and oranges).

But an attack on the veracity of the religion itself—an attack articulated through a spiritual as opposed to a secular paradigm—must be confronted by Muslims.

In short, Fr. Zakaria's success rests in the fact that he fights fire with fire; that he speaks the same language Muslims do—not just literally, Arabic, but more importantly, figuratively, the language of religion and faith, the language of God. He cannot simply be ignored.

For example, during this, his first episode, he discussed Sheikh Huwaini's recent assertions that Islam advocates plundering, enslaving, buying, and selling infidels. Many have written about this anecdote either to show that Islam is intrinsically violent, or that "radical Islamism" is spreading, or that Islamic teachings are incompatible with the West.

But Fr. Zakaria takes it a step further—takes it right to the heart of the matter. After asserting that "God created mankind in his image," he sincerely addressed his Muslim viewers: "Would God truly want you to kill your neighbor, to enslave him? Would the Almighty truly want believers to buy and sell other human beings like animals? Think people! Use your minds, listen to your hearts—for your souls are at stake!"

The same reason the secular mindset may find this approach too simplistic or "unsophisticated" is the same reason it is far from comprehending Islam.

Still in its early stages of development and financially challenged, Fady TV has yet to reach the Middle East, where the real battle for souls is waged, though the priest is hopeful. The station is set to air entire programs dedicated to examining various topics in depth, including the Koran, the Hadith, Muhammad, and Allah.

As I previously did, I plan on following and summarizing Fr. Zakaria's programs. See for example "The Perverse Sexual Habits of the Prophet" and "Was Muhammad a Messenger from God or Satan?" for a sampling.

For more information on this singular priest, read his exclusive 2009 FPM interview, wherein he discussed his life story, including the torments he experienced for preaching to Muslims in Egypt. Also, to get a feel for his very "non-dhimmi" approach, watch his famous "Ten Demands of Islam."

receive the latest by email: subscribe to raymond ibrahim's free mailing list Read more at www.raymondibrahim.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a17pez

Austrália: consultor despedido por ler o Alcorão, citá-lo e tirar conclusões lógicas

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

What did Joseph Adams say that was inaccurate? What did he say that was false? If Muhammad was not "the first terrorist of Islam," did he not say that he was, according to Islamic tradition? "I have been made victorious through terror" (Bukhari 4.52.220).

"Lib adviser sacked after anti-Islam web posts," by Heath Aston for the Sydney Morning Herald, July 10:

THE O'Farrell government has been embarrassed by a Liberal adviser who posted anti-Islamic comments online, including a description of the Prophet Muhammad as ''the first terrorist of Islam''. Joseph Adams, who worked in the electorate office of the Smithfield Liberal, Andrew Rohan, was sacked on Friday. Mr Adams, pictured, had angered some of his 1000 Facebook friends - which include 15 state government MPs and four ministers - with selected excerpts from the Koran which he said prove Islam promotes killing, not love. He was labelled a ''bigot'' and the ''biggest f---ing racist ever'' by shocked friends.

What race is Islam again?

A record of his posts between March 24 and June 17, obtained by The Sun-Herald, show the criticism only spurred him on to make more offensive remarks. ''The religious babble you refer to is Islam,'' he commented on June 4. ''There was no war. It was terrorism. Muhammad was the first terrorist in the name of Islam.'' He followed up with: "Why are you getting upset? I'm not the one who is teaching others to kill in the name of Islam. Mohommed is not my hero.''

Do Islamic jihadists not kill in the name of Islam? They consistently and unanimously explain and justify their actions with references to Islamic texts and teachings.

On March 24, he taunted ''friend'' Faten Dabs with the comment: ''If you leave Islam it is HALAL for you to be EXECUTED. Lol. No wonder people are afraid to leave Islam.''

Does Islam not have a death penalty for apostasy? Do not all the sects of Islam and schools of Islamic jurisprudence teach this? Did not Muhammad say, according to Islamic tradition, "Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him" (Bukhari 9.84.57)?

After being branded a bigot on Facebook , he responded: ''Your biblical quotes are as ridiculous as your comparisons. I guess you never paid attention at Sunday school. Jesus spoke in parables. Mohommed on the other hand gave orders to kill.

Did not Muhammad say, according to Islamic tradition, "If you gain a victory over the men of Jews, kill them" (Sunan Abu Dawud, 19.2996)?

''You seem to like standing up for killers and murderers. Is Ivan Milat a good person too? Perhaps you think Hitler was a great Prophet too? After all he did put a book together called Mein Kampf. Don't waste our time here Aaron. The only bigot here is someone with an uninformed view.''

Indeed.

Mr Adams, who identifies himself as an Australian of Assyrian Christian descent, told The Sun-Herald on Friday that he was not ''thinking politically'' when he made the remarks. ''Rather than listen to what people say about the Koran I decided I would read it myself,'' he said. ''It was nothing political, it was out of pure emotion. I didn't think it would be used against me and people would accuse me of being racist. ''What I did was a mistake, I did not think it would be used for political purposes. In my mind I was living in a free society where we value free speech. Why should religion be a taboo subject?''

Indeed.

But the Premier, Barry O'Farrell, did not agree. Late on Friday a government spokesman said in a statement: ''The comments were totally inappropriate and the staff member has already been terminated.''

Gutless dhimmi. Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a17d07

«Os idiotas úteis do islão»

Amplify’d from www.religionenlibertad.com

Los idiotas útiles del Islam.

Por Amil Imani

Amil Imani es un americano de origen iraní. Cronista, traductor, ensayista y militante por la democracia y los derechos humanos. El se ha dado como misión dar la alarma sobre el peligro del islamofascismo supremacista que se expande por el mundo libre.

Él invita a los iraníes a liberarse del yugo del Islam y de sus mulas, y a renovar con el rico patrimonio de la civilización persa pre-islámicas.

Le mensaje d de su artículo: el infierno está pavimentado de buenas intenciones donde se pasa en 30 años del "socialismo con rostro humano" de los gulags soviéticos al Islam, “la religión del amor, la tolerancia y de la paz”

Amil Imani, 1 de Julio de 2011 El Islam cuenta con un aliado importante e influyente entre los no-musulmanes: Una nueva generación de "idiotas útiles",  a los que Lenin identificó viviendo en las democracias liberales, que fomentaron el trabajo del comunismo. Esta nueva generación de idiotas útiles que también viven en las democracias liberales, pero sirven a la causa de islamofascismo -otra forma virulenta de la ideología totalitaria.   Los diotas útiles son ingenuos, son tontos, son ignorantes de los hechos, ellos son excesivamente idealistas, son soñadores y deliberadamente son incapaces de aceptar la realidad o engañosos. Provienen de las filas de los infelices crónicos. Ellos son anarquistas, son aspirantes revolucionarios, son neuróticos que están en guerra con la vida, los descontentos alejados de gobierno, corporaciones, y de casi todas las instituciones de la sociedad. El idiota útil puede ser un millonario, una estrella de cine, un académico de renombre, un político, o pertenecer a cualquier otro segmento de la población. Sin duda, la variante más peligrosa del idiota útil es el "políticamente correcto". Él es el maestro principal del eufemismo, de cobertura, del doble sentido, y del engaño descarado.   El idiota útil tiene satisfacción en ser anti-establishment. Él encuentra satisfacción perversa en la ayuda a las fuerzas que tienen como objetivo desmantelar un orden existente, lo que puede ser: un orden al que no aprueba ni al que siente pertenecer. El idiota útil es conflictivo y deshonesto. Él puede mirar dentro de sí mismo y descubrir las causas de sus problemas e infelicidad, mientras que fácilmente se alista en causas que validan su percepción distorsionada.   Evidentemente, es más fácil culpar a los demás y el mundo exterior que examinarse a sí mismo con la vista puesta en el auto-descubrimiento y auto-superación. Por otra parte, la critica y queja de las prácticas liberales del idiota útil requiere poco de talento y energía. El idiota útil es un gran filósofo de sillón y “estratega del lunes por la mañana."   El idiota útil no es lo mismo que una persona que tiene un punto de vista honestamente diferente. Una sociedad sin diferentes opiniones honestas y abiertas es una sociedad muerta. Ideas críticas, diferentes y frescas son la sangre vital de una sociedad viva  –son el verdadero anatema de las autocracias, donde la posición oficial es sacrosanta.

Incluso una persona "normal" gasta mucha más energía con el objetivo de arreglar las cosas que funcionan que para superar sus propios defectos y carencias, o contribuir positivamente a la sociedad en general. A la gente no le gusta hacer un balance de lo que está haciendo o no haciendo que es responsable de las condiciones de los que lo desaprueban.   Pero el idiota útil se toma las cosas mucho más lejos. El idiota útil, entre otras cosas, es un profesional en buscar chivos expiatorios. Él le asigna la culpa a los demás mientras se absuelve de toda la responsabilidad, tiene una larga lista de candidatos a mano para culparles de cualquier cosa y de todo, y por vivir una vida distorsionada que contribuye a los males de la sociedad. El idiota útil, incluso puede participar en la desinformación y el engaño intencional cuando le conviene. Términos tales como "Islam político", o "Islam radical", por ejemplo, son las contribuciones de los tontos útiles. Estos términos ni siquiera existen en el lenguaje nativo del Islam, simplemente porque son redundantes. Islam, por su propia naturaleza y de acuerdo con sus estatutos -el Corán- es un movimiento político radical. Es el idiota útil  el que desinfecta el Islam y desvía a la población diciendo que el "Islam verdadero" constituye el cuerpo principal de la religión, y que este cuerpo principal es de carácter no político y moderado.   Lamentablemente, una gran parte de la población va de la mano con estos eufemismos absurdos sobre lo que representa el Islam, porque prefiere creerlos. Es menos amenazante creer que solamente un segmento pequeño de secuestrados del Islam es radical o conducido por motivaciones políticas y que el cuerpo principal del Islam es de hecho moderado y apolítico.   Pero el Islam es político hasta la médula. En el Islam la Mezquita y el Estado son uno y  la Mezquita es el Estado. Este acuerdo se remonta a la época del mismo Muhammad. El Islam es también radical en extremo. Incluso el Islam "moderado" es radical en sus creencias, así como sus obras. Los musulmanes creen que todos los no-musulmanes, sin excepción, están confinados a ir al fuego del infierno y bien merecen ser maltratados en comparación con los creyentes. Ningún acto de barbarie radical de depravación es impensable para los musulmanes en el trato con los demás. Ellos han destruido preciosas estatuas de Buda, nivelado monumentos sagrados de otras religiones, y arrasado los cementerios de los no-musulmanes, algunos ejemplos de su extremos desprecio hacia los demás.   Los musulmanes son radicales, incluso en sus relaciones con los correligionarios. Las distintas sectas y sub sectas consideran a las otras sectas y sub-sectas herejes dignas de muerte; las mujeres son tratadas como esclavas, privadas de muchos derechos, se cortan las manos por robar ni siquiera un pedazo de pan; la violación sexual se castiga con la lapidación, y mucho, mucho, más. Estos son estándares del día a día de la corriente "moderada" de los musulmanes que viven bajo las leyes de la edad de piedra de la Shari´a. La "corriente principal moderada" del Islam ha sido francamente genocida desde su inicio. Su propios historiadores recuerdan que Ali, el primer imám de los chiítas y yerno de Muhammad, con la ayuda de otro hombre, decapitó a 700 hombres judíos ante la presencia del Profeta. El Profeta de Alá y sus discípulos tomaron las mujeres de los hombres asesinados y sus niños en esclavitud. Los musulmanes han sido y siguen siendo los  más crueles y descarados  profesionales de la esclavitud. El comercio de esclavos, incluso hoy en día, es un negocio próspero en algunos países islámicos, donde los pervertidos jeques ricos compran a los traficantes hijos de pobres para su satisfacción sádica.   A los musulmanes se les enseña el engaño y la mentira en el mismo Corán, algo que Muhammad practicó durante su vida cada vez que le resultaba conveniente. Los sucesivos gobernantes islámicos y sus líderes han hecho lo mismo. Jomeini, el fundador de la Revolución Iraní de 1979, por ejemplo, reunió a la gente bajo la bandera de la democracia. Todo su apoyo a la democracia no era el compromiso de un hombre honesto, sino una artimaña. Tan pronto como él controló las riendas del poder, Jomeini fue con venganza detrás de los idiotas útiles de su tiempo.

Esos mejores niños de Irán, habiendo sido engañados y usados a fondo por el astuto farsante populista y fanático religioso, tuvieron que huir del país para evitar el destino de las decenas de millares que fueron encarcelados o ejecutados por el imán traidor.

Casi tres décadas después de la trágica Revolución Islámica de 1979, el sofocante gobierno del Islam proyecta su muerte, extendiendo su manto de muerte sobre los iraníes. Un pueblo orgulloso con envidiable herencia está siendo sistemáticamente purgado de su sentido de identidad y obligado a pensar y comportarse como los bárbaros e intolerantes musulmanes. Los iraníes, que siempre habían tratado a las mujeres con igualdad, por ejemplo, las han visto reducidas por el clero de la edad de piedra al estatus sub-humano de la enseñanza islámica. Cualquier intento por parte de las mujeres de Irán para hacer frente a la regla de misógino de los mulás de Muhammad es reprimido despiadadamente. Las mujeres son golpeadas, encarceladas, violadas y asesinadas al igual que los hombres son sacrificados sin el debido proceso o misericordia.   La lección es clara. Tengan cuidado de los idiotas útiles que viven en las democracias liberales. A sabiendas o no, ellos sirven como los más grandes voluntarios y soldados efectivos del Islam. Ellos allanan el camino para el avance del Islam y ellos seguramente serán unas de las primeras víctimas del Islam tan pronto como éste asuma el poder.

NOTAS

FamilySecurityMatters.org http://www.fsmarchives.org/  editor colaborador Amil Imani es una escritor iraní-estadounidense, poeta, escritor satírico, novelista, ensayista, traductor literario, conferencisante y analista político que ha estado escribiendo y hablando sobre el peligro del Islam radical, tanto en América como internacionalmente. Se ha convertido en una voz formidable en los Estados Unidos contra el peligro del Yihad global y la islamización de América. Él mantiene un sitio web en www.amilimani.com .Amil Imani es el autor del libro fascinante y el próximo thriller de Operation Persian Gulf.   http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.9860/pub_detail.asp Read more at www.religionenlibertad.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a17bz7

A verdade é como o azeite e libertar-nos-á

O povo diz que «a verdade é como o azeite: acaba sempre por vir ao de cima»; Jesus disse que a verdade nos há-de libertar (Jo. 8:32[http://goo.gl/oTThs]).
O caso em apreço no artigo infra revela a justeza das frase citadas. Convém é que haja media atentos e dispostos a investigar:

Amplify’d from pajamasmedia.com

How the Dutch Gaza Flotilla Backfired Politically A fascinating tale of contemporary political warfare. July 4, 2011 - 7:05 pm - by Yochanan Visser Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page

A Dutch ship was organized as part of the Gaza flotilla in order to help Hamas, portray that effort has humanitarian, and create anti-Israel sentiment. The story of how this effort backfired is a fascinating tale of contemporary political warfare. Indeed, the end result has been to make the Dutch debate more pro-Israel and anti-Islamist.

Many articles — often with Dutch Internet media taking the lead — exposed alliances between Dutch far leftists and local Islamists who, together with some Christian groups, formed the organization Nederland-Gaza organizing Dutch participation in the second Gaza flotilla. The result has been a serious public debate and an actual increase in pro-Israel activity and support in the country.

As a result of the organizers’ extremism exposed by these reports, all of the Dutch journalists scheduled to sail to Gaza quit, complaining of the flotilla’s “dictatorial atmosphere, paranoia and mutual distrust.”

The Dutch blog KeesjeMaduraatje was one of the first to publish material about extremist elements in the second Gaza flotilla, revealing that Free Gaza Holland’s chairman, Rob Groenhuizen, was a convicted communist extremist who used to be a member of Dutch groups affiliated with the German terrorist Rote Armee Fraktion.

Groenhuizen’s group also had ties with the Palestinian terrorist organization PLFP and members participated in a terrorist training camp in Yemen in 1976.

In an e-mail exchange, Groenhuizen’s wrote about the second flotilla’s real goal:

This game about humanitarian aid is part of a tremendous plot — something that Israel tries to postpone as long as possible — but with every uprising in the Arab world and each mistake Israel makes, the end is coming nearer. … Everybody knows Israel is not sustainable.

Another Dutch  blogger, Carel Brendel, recently revealed more details about ties between Nederland-Gaza, Islamist groups in Europe, and Hamas in Gaza. On June 18 Brendel wrote that he had found evidence that the Italian NGO Associazione Benefica di Solidarieta con il Popolo Pelaestinense (ABSPP) and the Dutch NGO ISRAA  each had donated 100.000 euros for the purchase of the Dutch/Italian boat .

Dutch Hamas member Amin Abu Rashed, who was arrested last year on the Mavi Marmara, the Turkish ship  in the first flotilla, is co-founder of ISRAA, a Dutch Islamic charity. Rashed also co-founded the European Campaign to End the Siege of Gaza (ECESG) along with Ibrahim Akkari, a Dutch Muslim Brotherhood leader.

In addition, Rashed has worked for the Rotterdam-based Hamas charity El Aksa, banned by the Dutch authorities. That group was part of the network headed by Yusuf al-Qaradawi, the Muslim Brotherhood’s most influential cleric who has made fiery antisemitic statements.

The chairman of ISRAA, Mohamed el Doori, is also treasurer of the Dutch Federation of Islamic Organizations (FION), still another offshoot of the European Muslim Brotherhood. Both organizations are participating in the Nederland-Gaza coalition.

Continued on Next Page -> Page 1 of 2  Next ->   View as Single Page Read more at pajamasmedia.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a179we

Quem organizou o protesto «via avião» contra Israel?

Amplify’d from www.ynetnews.com

'Welcome to Palestine' campaign organizers include pro-Palestinian groups from Europe, United States. Organizers call activists who were barred from flight to 'pursue legal action as part of effort to expose Israel's racist policies'. Legal expert: Every country can decide who can and who cannot enter its borders

Who's behind the Ben-Gurion Airport fly-in? Dozens of pro-Palestinian activists who arrived on flights to Israel on Friday and denied entry by authorities were sent by several organizations based in Europe and the United States.   The campaign to bring international activists to Israel's airport, dubbed "Welcome to Palestine," was orchestrated months in advance and took meticulous planning.

The date was carefully selected, marking the seventh anniversary to the International Criminal Court's advisory opinion on the legality of the security fence, which rendered the fence illegal.   Among the organizers of the campaign is Movement Free Palestine, an American organization based in California, which according to its mission statement aims to "defend and advocate for the human rights of all Palestinians…by defying barriers imposed by Israeli and international authorities upon travel and trade to, from and within Palestine for Palestinians and persons invited by Palestinians."

The group is headed by Dr. Paul Larudee who co-initiated the "flytilla" idea. Larudee has a history of anti-Israeli activities and was deported from Israel by a court order in 2006. In 2010, Larudee participated in the Gaza-bound flotilla.   Other groups include London-based Palestinian Return Centre (PRC), which is affiliated with the Hamas and Muslim Brotherhood parties and denies Israel's right to exist, and Movement International Solidarity, which was founded over a decade ago with the aim of giving international humanitarian aid to Palestinians by employing non-violent means.   Israeli leftists organizations who supported the fly-in, but did not take part in its initiation or planning include the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions movement, which supports an international economic, political and cultural boycott on Israel; Anarchists Against the Wall – a group that protests against the security fence, which it claims is being built on Palestinian lands in the West Bank; The Alternative Information Center (AIC) – a joint Palestinian-Israeli non-governmental organization which "engages in dissemination of information, political advocacy, grassroots activism and critical analysis of the Palestinian-Israeli conflict"; and Occupation Magazine, which brings information and analysis in Hebrew and English through its online website.   Legal action Following the detention of dozens of activists on Friday, Spokesperson for "Welcome to Palestine" campaign Dr. Mazim Qumsiyeh slammed Israel, saying "the authorities made a mistake by letting security forces handle people who clearly don't pose a security risk."   "We're sick and tired of lying when we arrive at Allenby crossing or Ben-Gurion Airport to visit our Palestinian friends," said an International Solidarity Movement activist, adding that the Israeli action only highlights the "blockade on the West Bank."

"Welcome to Palestine" campaign organizers called on the airlines to struggle against the Israeli government's "extortionist, illegal and provocative" actions, adding that they are content with the outcome of the campaign, "Which further reveals Israel's policy toward Palestinian-related issues, and does not fare well with the basic principles of democracy and human rights."   Qumsiyeh noted that passengers who were not allowed to board their flights should "pursue their full rights, including legal action in their countries and in Israeli courts, as part of the effort to expose Israel's racist policies."   The Interior Ministry warned airlines in advance that passengers whose names appear on the "blacklist" and are allowed to fly to Israel – will be deported on the expense of the airline.   German federal police spokesperson noted that as long as a passenger has an airline ticket and a valid passport, there are no grounds to prevent him from flying. However, Swissair spokesperson told al-Jazeera network that the issue is regulated by the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO), which has a clear policy.   "If a country tells the airline that an individual will be barred from entering the country, this person will not be allowed to board the plane," explained the spokesperson.   "As a company, we are obliged to comply with the regulations and may not fly the passenger," he said, adding that the airline is "legally bound" by this policy because every country has the right to deny entry inside its borders.

International Bar Association Executive Director Dr. Mark Ellis also explained why Israel was acting in accordance with international law by denying the entry of individuals. "Every country has the right to say who can and who cannot enter its borders. It's a controversial matter, but not illegal," he noted.   In this case, Ellis added, Israel's position was justified, as it is derived from security considerations, which gives wider maneuvering room vis-à-vis flight restrictions. Read more at www.ynetnews.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a178vd

Arquivos do Vaticano prestes a revelar detalhes sobre genocídio arménio

Os democídios perpetrados por comunistas e por muçulmanos continuam a ser praticamente ignorados, nunca reconhecidos pelos perpetradores como tal e, em alguns casos, por essa entidade mitológica que responde pelo nome «Comunidade Internacional».
Os arquivos do Vaticano prometem revelar mais detalhes sobre o Genocídio Arménio perpetrado pelos turcos:

Amplify’d from www.zenit.org

Genocídio armênio: esclarecimentos da Santa Sé

Arquivos vaticanos são divulgados com finalidade histórica

CIDADE DO VATICANO, quinta-feira, 7 de julho de 2011 (ZENIT.org) – A morte de milhões de armênios, assassinados em 1915 pelos turcos otomanos, será objeto de uma publicação dos Arquivos Secretos Vaticanos, segundo anunciou nesta terça-feira o prefeito dos Arquivos, Dom Sergio Pagano.

Nesta quarta-feira, a Rádio Vaticano fez alguns esclarecimentos sobre a publicação destes documentos inéditos, destacando que não serão divulgados para criar polêmia, mas sim para fazer um trabalho histórico.

O genocídio começou no dia 24 de abril de 1915, em Istambul, capital do império otomano, com o assassinato de 600 notáveis armênios por ordem do governo.

No final do verão de 1915, dois terços dos armênios da Turquia haviam morrido em condições terríveis. As autoridades turcas falaram de um “massacre”.

João Paulo II, em visita a Erevan em 2001, foi mais preciso, segundo explicou a Rádio Vaticano.

Depois de ter rezado diante do memorial das vítimas, denunciou que “o extermínio de 1,5 milhão de cristãos armênios, no que se considera geralmente como o primeiro genocídio do século 20, e o aniquilamento de milhares de pessoas sob o antigo regime totalitário (soviético) são tragédias que ainda vivem na memória da geração atual”.

Naquele então, o Papa Bento XV havia escrito ao sultão para implorar sua clemência.

E durante sua visita a Istambul em 2006, Bento XVI deu graças a Deus “pela fé e pelo testemunho cristão do povo armênio, transmitidos de século em século e, às vezes, em circunstâncias trágicas, como na do século passado”.

A biblioteca vaticana tem provas e testemunhos destes acontecimentos terríveis, que serão objeto de um livro coeditado em breve pelo serviço dos Arquivos do Vaticano.

Este volume reunirá relatos que descrevem detalhadamente as torturas sofridas pelas vítimas.

A Rádio Vaticano citou, como exemplo, o fato de que os soldados otomanos faziam apostas sobre o sexo dos fetos das mulheres grávidas antes de esquartejá-las para saber o resultado. Read more at www.zenit.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a172n6

Hamas prende cabeleireiros de senhoras

Se calhar é para pôr cobro a estes absurdos que a «frota pacifista» se dirige para Gaza...

Amplify’d from www.bbc.co.uk

Hamas arrests male hairdresser for Gaza woman's haircut

By Jon Donnison

BBC News, Gaza City

Hamas argues it is enforcing a law supported by most of the population in Gaza

The Hamas government in Gaza has begun enforcing a law introduced last year banning men from cutting women's hair.

Until now, the law had not been enforced, but this week at least one male hairdresser in Gaza was arrested.

Male hairdressers for women are regarded by many Muslims as against Islamic tradition.

The move is seen as an attempt to bolster Hamas's Islamic credentials against critics who say it has become too moderate.

'Undercover police'

The reality is in Gaza - with its huge Muslim majority - most women do not want to have their hair cut by men.

Nevertheless a few salons have clung on, where male hairdressers work.

This week they are sitting idle outside their shops, fearful of arrest if they step inside.

Adnan Barakat, a hairdresser with 27 years experience, said: "Without work, I am like a dead man, because I am without work. The salon cannot work without me. This is my work since 1984. I haven't another work. What can I do?"

Others, like Mr Barakat, complain they are being watched by undercover police.

Hamas argues it is only enforcing a law that the majority of people here want. Read more at www.bbc.co.uk

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16wna

Hitchens sobre a frota «pacifista pro-Gaza»

Hitchens é um conhecido militante do ateísmo. Talvez por ser mais culto do que a maioria dos ateus e por possuir alguma honestidade intelectual, conhece bem o islão. Ele próprio já sentiu na pele o peso da mão muçulmana que cai sobre «o infiel», quando no Líbano foi sovado por um grupo de zelosos muçulmanos.
Tenha-se presente que o ateísmo é, no islão, uma forma de grave de descrença, para alguns muçulmanos a mais grave. A punição prescrita por uma hadith canónica para o ateísmo é a morte [Sahih Bukhari, 9:84:57 http://goo.gl/S91b3].
Sobre a matéria, veja http://goo.gl/u8WFq.

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

"Boat People: Some questions for the "activists" aboard the Gaza flotilla," by Christopher Hitchens for Slate, July 4:

The tale of the Gaza "flotilla" seems set to become a regular summer feature, bobbing along happily on the inside pages with an occasional update. A nice sidebar for reporters covering the Greek debt crisis: a built-in mild tension of "will they, won't they?"; a cast of not very colorful characters but one we almost begin to feel we know personally. Such cheery and breezy slogans—"the audacity of hope" and "free Gaza"—and such an easy storyline that it practically writes itself. Since Israel adopts a posture that almost guarantees a reaction of some sort in the not-too-distant future, and since there was such a frisson of violence the last time the little fleet set sail, there's no reason for it not to become a regular seasonal favorite.

However, given the luxury of time, might it not be possible to ask the "activists" onboard just a few questions? (Activist is a good neutral word, isn't it, with largely positive connotations? Even flotilla, with its reassuring diminuendo, has a "small is beautiful" sound to it.) Most of the speculation so far has been to do with methods and intentions, allowing for many avowals about peaceful tactics and so forth, but this is soft-centered coverage. I would like to know a little more about the political ambitions and implications of the enterprise.

It seems safe and fair to say that the flotilla and its leadership work in reasonably close harmony with Hamas, which constitutes the Palestinian wing of the Muslim Brotherhood. The political leadership of this organization is headquartered mainly in Gaza itself. But its military coordination is run out of Damascus, where the regime of Bashar Assad is currently at war with increasingly large sections of the long-oppressed Syrian population. Refugee camps, some with urgent humanitarian requirements, are making their appearance on the border between Syria and Turkey (the government of the latter being somewhat sympathetic to the purposes of the flotilla). In these circumstances, isn't it legitimate to strike up a conversation with the "activists" and ask them where they come out on the uprising against hereditary Baathism in Syria?

The little boats cannot make much difference to the welfare of Gaza either way, since the materials being shipped are in such negligible quantity. The chief significance of the enterprise is therefore symbolic. And the symbolism, when examined even cursorily, doesn't seem too adorable. The intended beneficiary of the stunt is a ruling group with close ties to two of the most retrograde dictatorships in the Middle East, each of which has recently been up to its elbows in the blood of its own civilians. The same group also manages to maintain warm relations with, or at the very least to make cordial remarks about, both Hezbollah and al-Qaida. Meanwhile, a document that was once accurately described as a "warrant for genocide" forms part of the declared political platform of the aforesaid group. There is something about this that fails to pass a smell test. I wonder whether any reporter on the scene will now take me up on this. Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16wcx

Reino Unido: grupo islâmico quer criar enclaves regidos pela xariá

Primeiro, ocupa-se uma zona; depois reclama-se o direito a viver de acordo com os princípios islâmicos; finalmente, adopta-se plena e exclusivamente a lei islâmica. Nada de novo. Veremos se os britânicos vão na cantiga.

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

UK: Islamic group calls for Sharia in three Muslim areas

And independence from British law. It is likely that this is already to a great degree the de facto situation in these areas; Muslims Against the Crusades is just being forthright about it. "Dewsbury, Bradford and Tower Hamlets ... where Islamic extremists want to establish independent states with sharia law," from the Daily Mail, July 5 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Islamic extremists have called on British Muslims to establish three independent states within the UK. The notorious Muslims Against the Crusades (MAC) group have named Yorkshire towns Bradford and Dewsbury and Tower Hamlets in East London as testbeds for blanket sharia rule. The medieval 'emirates' would operate entirely outside British law, according to a document on the MAC website. The MAC group, led by Abu Assadullah, was set up last year and has become notorious because of its violent protests, most provocatively burning poppies during the Remembrance Day silence. Under the heading 'Muslims should set up Islamic emirates in the UK', MAC says: 'We suggest it is time that areas with large Muslim populations declare an emirate delineating that Muslims trying to live within this area are trying to live by the sharia as much as possible with their own courts and community watch and schools and even self sufficient trade. 'Likely areas for these projects might be Dewsbury or Bradford or Tower Hamlets to begin with. 'In time we can envisage that the whole of the sharia might one day be implemented starting with these enclaves.' The call is likely to cause anger among moderate Muslims and community leaders in the areas concerned. Ian Greenwood, leader of Bradford Council, said people would 'not allow extremists to provoke them into violence'. London 7/7 bomber Mohammad Sidique Khan lived in Dewsbury, which has battled to diffuse extremism in recent years. In 2007, it was alleged that a number of Muslims in Dewsbury were running an illegal Islamic court from a school and similar claims have been made in Tower Hamlets and Bradford. Tower Hamlets council was last year accused of falling under the control of extremist groups following a documentary by the Daily Telegraph journalist Andrew Gilligan. The plan is part of the MAC's response to the government's revised Prevent strategy to combat Islamic extremism. In its document, called Islamic Prevent, the fanatics also call for an end to CCTV cameras in and around mosques. It says: 'Muslims must get rid of all CCTV cameras from Muslim institutions. Sadly many mosques have today adopted CCTV cameras to spy on Muslims on behalf of the police and local authorities.' Other inflammatory instructions include demanding the release of all Muslim prisoners, a ban on Muslims joining the police or armed forces and a rejection of British democracy. The document ends: 'We can conclude that measures by the UK government are nothing more than an attempt by them to strip the Muslim community of their Islamic identity and to integrate them into the non-Islamic way of life.'... Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16utx

10 factos que urge saber sobre o esclavagismo no islão

Amplify’d from www.radicalislam.org

Muslim slave trade in Africa has lasted 14 centuries and continues to this day in places like Mauritania, Saudi Arabia, and Sudan. Over 17 million slaves (mostly black women and children) were transported out of Africa by Islamic traders. Another 85 million are believed to have died en route. The Prophet Muhammad practiced and approved of slavery, and directed his men to do the same.  The Qur’an devotes more verses to informing Muslim men of their right to keep women as sex slaves, than it does to telling them to pray five times a day.  The Arabic word for “black” (Abd) is synonymous with the word for “slave”. Muhammad's father-in-law, Umar declared that Arabs could not be taken as slaves, and freed all Arab slaves.  This led to the wide Islamic campaign to capture slaves in Africa, Europe and Asia.   Western slave trade exploited Africans primarily for agricultural labor. The Arab slave trade on the other hand, has more often used men for military service, and women for sex and for their wombs – to produce children who will be Muslims. Many Muslim leaders since Muhammad have had harems of hundreds (or even thousands) of non-Muslim young girls and women to service their desires. Converting to Islam does not automatically grant a slave his freedom, although this is said to increase the slave master's heavenly reward. According to Islamic courts, slave masters may treat their slaves however they choose without fear of penalty. Read more at www.radicalislam.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16cpl

O islão deixa a sua marca em Itália, marca de sangue

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

Italy: Muslim murders wife for being "too Western"

"Italy: Moroccan immigrant murders wife for being 'too Western,'" from AKI, June 28 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Padua, 28 June (AKI) - A Moroccan carpenter living in northern Italy is suspected of stabbing his wife to death because she wanted to leave him and begin a more liberated and western life with another man.

Police suspect 36-year old Zrhaida Hammadi of killing his 33-year-old wife Fatima Chabani at their apartment in the city of Padua near Venice by stabbing her repeatedly in the neck and shoulder, severing her jugular vein.

Neighbours telephoned the police after hearing blood-curdling screams from the apartment late Sunday, but the police said they found Chabani already dead and Hammadi awaiting their arrival, sitting motionless in a chair with his head bowed.

The couple were married in 2002 and had a six-year-old son. The family moved to Padua in January from the surrounding province in Italy's northeast. Members of the local Moroccan community described Hammadi as "a quiet, decent and hard-working" man.

The couple reportedly had frequent rows and police are probing Hammadi's' claims that his wife was seeing another man.

On Tuesday, a cultural mediator in Padua, 30-year-old Tunisian Muslim immigrant Maher Selmi sparked controversy by claiming that it was right to stone "adulteresses" to death.

Moroccan women's activist and member of Italy's parliament Souad Sbai deplored Chabani's "chilling" slaying and the remarks by Selmi, who is a graduate in Italian language and literature.

"This is the latest outrage against an innocent young woman whose only crime was her desire to live peacefully," said Sbai.

Sbai is a member of parliament for the ruling conservative People of Freedom party and president of the Association of Moroccan Women in Italy.

Her group made an unsuccessful application to form the civil plaintiff in the murder trial of three male relatives of a twenty-year-old Pakistani woman, Hina Saleem found buried in the garden of her family home with her throat slit and her head facing Mecca in August 2006.

Hina had 'dishonoured' the family by dressing in western clothes, working in a pizzeria in the northern town of Sarezzo and living with her Italian boyfriend and refusing and arranged marriage

In February, 2010, Italy's Supreme Court said Hina's father Mohammed Saleem must serve the entire 30-year prison sentence handed to him for her murder, ruling that he acted "out of a distorted, pathological sense of parental possession" rather than for religious and cultural reasons.

What an odd ruling. Where does Italy's Supreme Court think that Mohammed Saleem got his "distorted, pathological sense of parental possession" other than from his religion, which stipulates that there is no punishment for a parent who kills his child?

Hina Saleem's shocking murder is one of several "honour" crimes which have brought the issue of Muslim cultural integration in Italy into stark relief in recent years. El Ketaoui Dafani a Moroccan immigrant cook is currently standing trial for the murder of Sanaa Dafani in northeastern Italy in September 2009 after he discovered she had a relationship with an older Italian man.... Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16cj0

Costa do Marfim: muçulmanos crucificam dois cristãos

Os muçulmanos fazem o que o Alcorão manda:
Alcorão 5:33 (http://quran.com/5/33):
«O castigo, para aqueles que lutam contra Deus e contra o Seu Mensageiro e semeiam a corrupção na terra, é que sejam mortos, ou crucificados, ou lhes seja decepada a mão e o pé opostos, ou banidos. Tal será, para eles, um aviltamento nesse mundo e, no outro, sofrerão um severo castigo.»

Do ponto de vista político, note-se que as tropas leais ao presidente eleito e que levaram a cabo esta piedosa acção, foram colocadas no poder pelas tropas da ONU com os franceses do Sr. Sarkozy à cabeça. Note-se, ainda, que a contestação à eleição de Ouatara se devia ao facto de a sua candidatura ser anti-constitucional, segundo os seus opositores, dado que era filho de emigrantes muçulmanos em hijra (migração) para espalhar o islão, à semelhança de milhões de outros muçulmanos a quem foi dada a cidadania marfinense nas últimas décadas.

Amplify’d from www.jihadwatch.org

Ivory Coast: Muslims crucify Christian brothers

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter." -- Qur'an 5:33

It looks as if these brothers' apparent support for the Christian Gbagbo over the Muslim Ouattara constituted "waging war against Allah and His Messenger."

"Brothers crucified by Ouattara forces in Ivory Coast," from Barnabas Aid, June 8 (thanks to Marty):

Two peasant brothers were brutally crucified on “the example of Christ” as forces loyal to Ivory Coast President Alassane Ouattara continue to target perceived supporters of his ousted Christian predecessor, Laurent Gbagbo. Raphael Aka Kouame died of his injuries; incredibly his younger brother, Kouassi Privat Kacou, survived the ordeal. The pair were badly beaten and tortured before being crudely nailed to cross-shaped planks by their hands and feet with steel spikes on 29 May. The brothers were falsely accused of hiding weapons in their home village of Binkro, which has been targeted by Ouattara supporters as the birthplace of a key enemy. They are looking for Prefect Koko Djei, President of the General Council of Oumé and an official in Gbagbo’s Ivorian Popular Front party, who is accused of distributing weapons to young Oumé men. The brothers repeatedly denied any involvement in a weapons cache, but their pleas were ignored. After crucifying the brothers, Ouattara’s men took them on an extensive search of Binkro, but they found only a store of medical equipment and supplies, which they looted. The seriously wounded pair were then taken to prison in Oumé, where Raphael died in the night.... Read more at www.jihadwatch.org

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16ce7

«Na Holanda aumentam os casos de perturbação muçulmana de funerais de infiéis»

Alcorão 5:14 (http://quran.com/5/14):
«E também aceitamos a promessa daqueles que disseram: Somos cristãos! Porém, esqueceram-se de grande parte do que lhes foi recomendado, pelo que disseminamos a inimizade e o ódio entre eles, até ao Dia da Ressurreição. Deus os inteirará,então, do que cometeram.»

Alcorão 5:51-52 (http://quran.com/5/51-52):
«51Ó fiéis, não tomeis por confidentes os judeus nem os cristãos; que sejam confidentes entre si. Porém, quem dentre vós ostomar por confidentes, certamente será um deles; e Deus não encaminha os iníquos. 52Verás aqueles que abrigam a morbidez em seus corações apressarem-se em Ter intimidades com eles, dizendo:Tememos que nos açoite uma vicissitude! Oxalá Deus te apresente a vitória ou algum outro desígnio Seu e, então,arrepender-se-ão de tudo quanto haviam maquinado.»

Alcorão 4:101 (http://quran.com/4/101):
«Quanto viajantes pela terra não sereis recriminados por abreviardes as orações, temendo que vos ataquem osincrédulos; em verdade, eles são vossos inimigos declarados.»

Amplify’d from www.religionenlibertad.com

Actualizado 30 junio 2011 "Un perro menos". Jóvenes musulmanes interrumpen funerales cristianos en Holanda

Hombre Periodista: Buenos días. Amerstoort ayer por la mañana. Los familiares acompañaron a la difunta Sra. Hazeleger a su último lugar de descanso. Pero para su horror, el funeral fue súbitamente emboscado por niños de origen marroquí. Y no es la primera vez que ocurre un incidente de este tipo. Aquí está nuestro informe: Familiar y testigo presencial: De repente empezaron a gritar de alegría, con los dedos estirados hacia arriba y otros gestos de este tipo. Creo que esto es realmente vergonzoso Mujer Periodista: Indignación en Amersfoort El martes pasado, estudiantes de esta escuela islámica interrumpieron un funeral. A medida que la caravana pasaba delante de los estudiantes, estos comenzaron a gritar y hacer gestos obscenos. Mucha consternación entre los familiares que iban en la procesión del funeral. Familiar y testigo presencial: Estoy mejor ahora, pero yo estaba muy dolido por esto. Mujer Periodista: Con creciente regularidad los funerales son perturbados por los jóvenes revela Grete Braak, directora de la funeraria que dirige desde hace muchos años. Varias veces tuvo que presenciar como estos jóvenes desbarataban totalmente un funeral. Con un solo propósito: hacer daño a los familiares. Grete Braak, Directora de Pompas Fúnebres: Yo quería volver a la calle y vi llegar a un grupo de chicos. Me detuve para dejarlos pasar. Y me preguntaron: "¿se trata de un musulmán?" Yo les contesté: "No, ¿por qué?" A continuación, corrieron hacia el coche y golpearon el techo con sus puños, y dijeron: “un perro menos” _________________________________________________________________ Hasta la fecha no ha habido disculpas por parte de la dirección de la escuela ni de los líderes religiosos del Islam en Holanda. ¿Para qué? Si todos saben lo que dice el Corán Corán 5:14: Concertamos un pacto con quienes decían: "Somos cristianos". Pero olvidaron parte de lo que se les recordó y, por eso, provocamos entre ellos enemistad y odio hasta el día de la Resurrección. Pero ya les informará Alá de lo que hacían. Corán 5:51-52: ¡Creyentes! ¡No toméis como amigos a los judíos y a los cristianos! Son amigos unos de otros. Quien de vosotros trabe amistad con ellos, se hace uno de ellos. Alá no guía al pueblo impío. Ves a los enfermos de corazón precipitarse a ellos, diciendo: "Tenemos miedo de un revés de fortuna". Pero puede que Alá traiga el éxito u otra cosa de Él y, entonces, se dolerán de lo que habían pensado en secreto. Corán 4:101: …Los infieles son para vosotros un enemigo declarado. Corán 8:15-17: Creyentes! Cuando os encontréis con los infieles marchando, no les volváis la espalda! Quien ese día les vuelva la espalda -a menos que sea que se destaque para acudir a otro combate o para incorporarse a otra tropa- incurrirá en la ira de Alá y tendrá la gehena por morada. Qué mal fin...! No erais vosotros quienes les mataban, era Alá Quien les mataba. Cuando tirabas, no eras tú quien tiraba, era Alá Quien tiraba, para hacer experimentar a los creyentes un favor venido de Él. Alá todo lo oye, todo lo sabe. NOTAS Para visionar el video, pulsar AQUÍ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wpImdawOJLw&feature=player_embedded http://www.religionenlibertad.com/articulo.asp?idarticulo=16260 Read more at www.religionenlibertad.com

 

See this Amp at http://amplify.com/u/a16c1f